Early vs. Delayed Surgical Management of Ruptured Arteriovenous Brain Malformations in a Tertiary Referral Center in Colombia, South America

Felipe Gutierrez Pineda,Esteban Quiceno,Mauro Marcelo Suarez Marin,Francisco Javier Londoño Ocampo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.073
2024-08-19
Abstract:Introduction: Surgical timing after rupture of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is controversial. There is scarce literature on AVM surgical outcomes from developing countries. This study aims to determine if there is a difference between early and delayed surgical resection for patients with ruptured brain AVMs. Methods: This single-center retrospective review included patients who underwent surgical resection for ruptured brain AVMs in Colombia. Patients were stratified by the timing of surgical intervention relative to the rupture into early (≤72 hours of bleeding) and delayed (>72 hours) resection. Continuous variables were analyzed using an independent t-test, and dichotomous variables were analyzed using a chi-square test. A linear-regression analysis was performed with the final mRankin score at 2 years as the dependent variable; p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Thirty-one patients were identified. The early treatment group included 14(45.2%) patients, and the delayed group, 17(54.8%) patients. The mean(SD) length of time between AVM rupture and surgical resection was 1.6±1.2 days and 12.4±8.4 days, respectively(p<0.001). There were no differences regarding demographics, perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes between groups. In the linear-regression analysis, the only variable that had a significant association with the final mRankin score was the initial GCS, which had a β coefficient of -0.6341(95%CI-0.41,-0.017,p=0.035) CONCLUSION: In this case series of 31 patients from a developing country, there were no differences in clinical outcomes at the final follow-up between acute and delayed surgical interventions for ruptured AVMs. The most important factor associated with the final outcomes was the initial GCS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?