Abstract:Background: Firearm injuries cause significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with firearm injuries require urgent/emergency operative procedures but the literature incompletely describes how anesthesia care and outcomes differ between high acuity trauma patients with and without firearm injuries. Our objective was to examine anesthesia care, resource utilization, and outcomes of patients with acute firearm injuries compared to nonfirearm injuries. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients ≥18 years admitted to a regional Level 1 trauma center between 2014 and 2022 who required operative management within the first 2 hours of hospital arrival. We examined clinical characteristics, anesthesiology care practices, and intra- and postoperative outcomes of patients with firearm injuries compared to patients with nonfirearm injuries. Results: Over the 9-year study period, firearm injuries accounted for the largest yearly average increase in trauma admissions (firearm 10.1%, blunt 3.2%, other 1.3%, motor-vehicle crash 0.9%). Emergency anesthesiology care within 2 hours of arrival was delivered to 4.7% of injured patients (2124; 541 firearm [25.4%] and 1583 [74.5%] nonfirearm). Patients with firearm injuries were younger (30 [23-40] years vs 41 [29-56] years; P < .0001), male (90% vs 75%; P < .0001), direct admissions from scene (78% vs 62%; P < .0001), had less polytrauma (10% vs 22%; P < .0001), arrived after hours (73% vs 63%; P < .0001), and received earlier anesthesiology care (0.4 [0.3-0.7] vs 0.9 [0.5-1.5] hours after arrival; P < .0001). Patients with firearm injuries more often received invasive arterial (83% vs 77%; P < .0001) and central venous (14% vs 10%; P = .02) cannulation, blood products (3 [0-11] vs 0 [0-7] units; P < .0001), tranexamic acid (30% vs 22%; P < .001), as well as had higher estimated blood loss (500 [200-1588] mL vs 300 [100-1000] mL; P < .0001), and were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) more frequently (83% vs 77%; P < .001) than patients with nonfirearm injuries. Intraoperative mortality was comparable (6% firearm vs 4% nonfirearm) but postoperative mortality was lower for patients with firearm injuries who survived the intraoperative course (6% vs 14%; P < .0001). Comparatively, more patients with firearm injuries were discharged to home, or to jail (P < .001). Conclusions: Over the study period, anesthesiologists increasingly cared for patients with firearm injuries, who often present outside of daytime hours and require urgent operative intervention. Operating room readiness and high-intensity resuscitation capacity, such as access to hemostatic control measures, are critical to achieving intraoperative survival and favorable postoperative outcomes, particularly for patients with firearm injuries.

Revisiting Amputation Rates in High-Pressure Injection Injuries

An Unusual High-Pressure Injection Injury Involving the Cervical Spinal Cord.

Emergency Anesthesiology Encounters, Care Practices, and Outcomes for Patients with Firearm Injuries: A 9-Year Single-Center US Level 1 Trauma Experience

Functional outcome of high-pressure injection injuries of the hand

Our Surgical Results in Popliteal and Infrapopliteal Artery Injuries: 21 Cases without Amputation

Management of industrial high-pressure fluid injection injuries (IHPFII): the Water Jetting Association (WJA) experience with water driven injuries

Possibility of Taking an Offensive Stance in Extravasation Injury: Effects of Fat Injection in Vesicant (Doxorubicin) Induced Skin Necrosis Model in Rats

Synovitis of the knee following a high-pressure injection injury with hydraulic oil

[Effectiveness of Dorsal Perforator Flap of Cross-Finger Proper Digital Artery in Treatment of High-Pressure Injection Injuries of the Finger].

Quantitative Analysis of Anesthesia Utilization in Ambulatory Hand Surgery

Evaluating Two Decades of Traumatic Amputations Treated in US Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Epidemiological Analysis from NEISS

Investigation of treatment outcomes for severe extremity trauma in an independent orthopedic trauma center: A case series

Characteristics of Individuals Admitted to Vascular Surgery Service for a Major Lower Limb Amputation From 2017 to 2021 With Present on Admission Pressure Injuries

Fixation or Revision for Periprosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology, New Trends, and Projections in the United States

Outcomes of Surgical and Endovascular Treatment for Arterial Lesions in Intravenous Drug Abusers

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Contemporary Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties

Current Outcomes Following Upper and Lower Extremity Arterial Trauma from the National Trauma Data Bank

A single center descriptive study of local anesthetic dose in knee arthroplasty: Was there evidence of local anesthetic systemic toxicity?

Complications Following Treatment of Supination External Rotation Ankle Fractures Through the Posterolateral Approach

The Effect of Limb Salvage Efforts in Different Age Groups: Relationships Between Major and Minor Amputations

Readmission within 30-days of open reduction and internal fixation for ankle fractures: NSQIP analysis of 29,905 patients