Analysis of the interlink between glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) and lung cancer through multi-omics databases

Parth Thakor,M Quadir Siddiqui,Trushar R Patel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35158
IF: 3.776
2024-07-30
Heliyon
Abstract:Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) is a crucial enzyme that executes the pentose phosphate pathway. Due to its critical nodal position in the metabolic network, it is associated with different forms of cancer tumorigeneses and progression. Nonetheless, its functional role and molecular mechanism in lung cancer remain unknown. The present study provides intricate information associated with G6PD and Lung Cancer. Varieties of public datasets were retrieved by us, including UALCAN, TCGA, cBioPortal, and the UCSC Xena browser. The data obtained were used to assess the expression of G6PD, its clinical features, epigenetic regulation, relationship with tumour infiltration, tumour mutation burden, microsatellite instability, tumour microenvironment, immune checkpoint genes, genomic alteration, and patient's overall survival rate. The present study revealed that the G6PD expression was correlated with the clinical features of lung cancer including disease stage, race, sex, age, smoking habits, and lymph node metastasis. Moreover, the expression profile of G6PD also imparts epigenetic changes by modulating the DNA promoter methylation activity. Methylation of promoters changes the expression of various transcription factors, genes leading to an influence on the immune system. These events linked with G6PD-related mutational gene alterations (FAM3A, LAG3, p53, KRAS). The entire circumstance influences the patient's overall survival rate and poor prognosis. Functional investigation using STRING, GO, and KEGG found that G6PD primarily engages in hallmark functions (metabolism, immunological responses, proliferation, apoptosis, p53, HIF-1, FOXO, PI3K-AKT signaling). This work provides a wide knowledge of G6PD's function in lung cancer, as well as a theoretical foundation for possible prognostic therapeutic markers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?