Abstract:Importance: Predictive factors associated with increased risk of medical malpractice litigation have been identified, including severity of injury, physician sex, and error in diagnosis. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating informed consent in spinal surgery malpractice.Objective: To investigate the failure to obtain informed consent as an allegation in medical malpractice claims for patients undergoing a spinal procedure.Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, a national medicolegal database was searched for malpractice claim cases related to spinal surgery for all years available (ie, January 1, 1980, through December 31, 2015).Main Outcomes and Measures: Failure to obtain informed consent and associated medical malpractice case verdict.Results: A total of 233 patients (117 [50.4%] male and 116 [49.8%] female; 80 with no informed consent allegation and 153 who cited lack of informed consent) who underwent spinal surgery and filed a malpractice claim were studied (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [13.1] years in the total group, 45.8 [12.9] years in the control group, and 47.9 [13.3] years in the informed consent group). Median interval between year of surgery and year of verdict was 5.4 years (interquartile range, 4-7 years). The most common informed consent allegations were failure to explain risks and adverse effects of surgery (52 [30.4%]) and failure to explain alternative treatment options (17 [9.9%]). In bivariate analysis, patients in the control group were more likely to require additional surgery (45 [56.3%] vs 53 [34.6%], P = .002) and have more permanent injuries compared with the informed consent group (46 [57.5%] vs 63 [42.0%], P = .03). On multivariable regression analysis, permanent injuries were more often associated with indemnity payment after a plaintiff verdict (odds ratio [OR], 3.12; 95% CI, 1.46-6.65; P = .003) or a settlement (OR, 6.26; 95% CI, 1.06-36.70; P = .04). Informed consent allegations were significantly associated with less severe (temporary or emotional) injury (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.97; P = .04). In addition, allegations of informed consent were found to be predictive of a defense verdict vs a plaintiff ruling (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.98; P = .046) or settlement (OR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001-0.15; P < .001).Conclusions and Relevance: Lack of informed consent is an important cause of medical malpractice litigation. Although associated with a lower rate of indemnity payments, malpractice lawsuits, including informed consent allegations, still present a time, money, and reputation toll for physicians. The findings of this study can therefore help to improve preoperative discussions to protect spinal surgeons from malpractice claims and ensure that patients are better informed.

Informed Consent Practices for Hip Fracture Surgeries at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Wad Madani, Sudan

Assessing the quality of consent in elective hip and knee arthroplasty: Do modern orthopaedic surgeons make the cut?

Assessing the Process of Written Informed Consent for Surgical Procedures among Inpatients: A Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Southern India

Lack of informed consent for surgical procedures by elderly patients with inability to consent: a retrospective chart review from an academic medical center in Norway

Systems issues limiting acute fracture care delivery at a tertiary care hospital in Northern Tanzania

"Uninformed" Consent: Patient Recollection From Surgical Consent in Hand Surgery-A Quality Improvement Initiative

Reevaluating Informed Consent: Integrating Shared Decision-Making into Spinal Surgery for Better Patient Outcomes

Informed consent practice and associated factors among healthcare professionals in public hospitals of Southern Ethiopia, 2023: a mixed-method study

Do patients actually understand? An evaluation of the informed consent process for endoscopic procedures in rural Uganda

Informing the process of consent for surgery: identification of key constructs and quality factors

Patient consent in the post-Montgomery era: A national multi-speciality prospective study

Neurosurgical Wrong Surgical Site in Lower-Middle- or Low-Income Countries (LMICs): A Survey Study

Knowledge, Attidue and Practice of Advanced Trauma Life Suppoort (ATLS) Protocol among House-Officers in Khartoum State Hospitals, Sudan, 2023

Interventions and strategies for enhancing the consent process in neurosurgery. A systematic review of the literature

A qualitative study on informed consent decision-making at two tertiary hospitals in Uganda: Experiences of patients undergoing emergency surgery and their next of kin

Informed consent in the context of research involving acute injuries and emergencies

Allegations of Failure to Obtain Informed Consent in Spinal Surgery Medical Malpractice Claims

A pilot study on the global practice of informed consent in paediatric dentistry

Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study

Information disclosure in clinical informed consent: "reasonable" patient's perception of norm in high-context communication culture

Experience in the perioperative management of patients with hip fracture in southwestern Colombia. Retrospective cohort study