"Someone to talk to": A qualitative study of oncology trainees' experience of mentorship around moral distress

Beatrice T B Preti,Sarah Wood
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13797
2024-08-20
Abstract:Background: Moral distress is an intrinsic part of healthcare, particularly prevalent in oncology practitioners. Previous studies have suggested mentorship may play a role in combatting moral distress; however, there is a lack of good evidence aimed at understanding trainees' experience with either mentorship or moral distress, including the intersection between the two. Methods: We conducted a single-centre study in the hermeneutic phenomenological approach at a Canadian academic cancer centre. Six semi-structured interviews with senior oncology trainees were conducted and analysed according to the interpretive profiles hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Findings/results: Key findings include the idea that trainees do find mentorship valuable and helpful in navigating moral distress, which is described as common and inevitable, with a number of triggers and factors identified. However, a mentorship relationship must involve mutual respect, understanding, and honesty in order to be valuable. Additionally, engaging in open, honest discussions with mentors, particularly more senior individuals, is seen as a risk-benefit balance by trainees; vertical mentors bring more wisdom and experience, but may also have a greater impact on a trainee's future. Conclusion: This thought-provoking study highlights mentorship as a potential method to combat the troubling phenomenon of moral distress in oncology trainees.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?