Accuracy of vitality and sensibility testing in mature and immature anterior teeth: a clinical trial

Mohammed Bux,Mohammed Adam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-024-01054-y
2024-08-20
Abstract:Introduction: Determining the health the status of the pulp is crucial in treatment planning. Both sensibility and vitality testing techniques may be employed. Sensibility testing may be inaccurate in teeth with incomplete root apices. This study intends to compare the accuracy of cold testing (CT), electric pulp testing (EPT) and pulse oximetry (PO) in determining pulpal status of mature and immature anterior teeth. Methods: 20 mature and 20 immature maxillary permanent incisors of healthy 6-12-year-olds were included. Teeth were categorised as mature permanent central incisors, immature permanent central incisors, and a negative control group with endodontically treated incisors. Vitality and sensitivity tests were performed using EPT, CT, and PO, with measurements taken thrice per tooth. PO was measured with infant pulse oximetry probe sensors placed on the tooth surfaces and fingers. Descriptive statistics were computed, and data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Spearman correlation coefficient analysed correlations between dental and finger SpO2 measurements, while the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post-hoc analysis compared SpO2 and EPT measurements across tooth development stages, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Results: SpO2 values were significantly higher in immature teeth compared to mature teeth (p < 0.05), and both were significantly higher than in the negative control group. There was no significant correlation between SpO2 values measured from fingers and teeth. EPT values were significantly higher in immature teeth compared to mature teeth (p < 0.001). The accuracy rate of PO, EPT, and cold tests was 100% in this study, with no false positive or negative responses in the control group. The SpO2 values in mature and immature vital teeth ranged between 80-92%. Conclusions: PO is a reliable and non-invasive method for determining pulp vitality in both mature and immature teeth, comparable to traditional sensitivity tests like EPT and CT. PO can be considered an alternative vitality test, especially useful in paediatric dental patients due to its atraumatic and objective nature. Further studies with larger sample sizes and additional vitality tests like doppler flowmetry are recommended to enhance the clinical diagnosis of pulp vitality in anterior and posterior teeth.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?