Editorial comment: The right coronary artery: which graft and how to use it?
H. Barner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezr308
IF: 4.534
2012-08-01
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Abstract:right coronary system, we used the gastroepiploic artery targeted to the PDA. Today, because of the off-pump technique, we perform a lot of Y composite grafting with two mammaries. It all depends on the location of the marginal that we have to graft on the lateral wall of the heart. So, for example, if we have to graft only one proximal marginal artery, we will use two mammaries in an in situ configuration and the gastroepiploic artery targeted to the PDA. If there are several marginals to graft on the lateral wall of the heart, then we prefer to use a Y graft configuration with two mammaries, and if, only if, the right coronary artery is very stenosed, then we will complete the CABG with the right mammary on the PLA or PDA. We will do exactly the same with the gastroepiploic artery. We have clearly demonstrated that with the gastroepiploic artery as well as the right mammary used in a Y graft configuration, when targeted to the right coronary system, if you want to have a functional graft, and I mean by functional, an antegrade flow through the graft, you have to have a very narrowed right coronary artery. In order to evaluate the severity of the RCA, we prefer to use the MLD, minimum lumen diameter, rather than percentage of stenosis, because I think that the percentage of stenosis is clearly not a good tool to evaluate the severity of the lesion. But if you have an MLD of less than 0.7 mm, then, yes, we will use an arterial graft targeted to the RCA. If the MLD is above 1 mm, then we will use a saphenous vein graft. So today, you are completely right, we will prefer to use a vein if the lesion is, let’s say, moderate to 70–80%—and once again I don’t like to speak in terms of per cent of stenosis, I think that it is not a good tool to evaluate severity of the stenosis—and if it is above 80%, then, yes, we will use an artery. Dr D. Taggart (Oxford, UK): Let me ask the audience before we come to the gastroepiploic. If you use a second mammary artery routinely, and let’s define routinely by over 50%, how many in the audience use a second mammary artery in 50% or more of patients? (Show of hands). Dr Taggart: So clearly far more than 4% of the general population, and I guess if you are at this meeting you are interested in arterial grafts. So that was probably somewhere around 40% of the audience. How many people use a gastroepiploic? (Show of hands). Dr Taggart: Would you like to make a comment about that, please? Dr G. Tavilla (Nijmegen, Netherlands): I routinely use the GEA at least every week, and I agree with Dr Glineur that the GEA has to be used in the case of a very tight stenosis; ideally the coronary artery is occluded. I am convinced that using three arterial grafts is associated with better long-term outcomes than two arterial grafts plus vein grafts. Dr Taggart: And if you don’t have a very significant stenosis in the right, what would you use to the PDA? Dr Tavilla: I use a Y graft. Dr Taggart: Using what conduits? Dr Tavilla: The right mammary artery anastomosed on the left mammary. Dr Taggart: Even for a moderate stenosis? Dr Tavilla: Yes, and I try to attach the left anastomosis high to the PDA in order to avoid competitive flow. Dr Taggart: Thank you. We have some Japanese guests here. Dr Suma in Japan used to be very keen on the gastroepiploic and published extensively, so what is happening in Japan now? Dr T. Asai (Shiga, Japan): It depends on the facility and the surgeon. Maybe I am one of the most active users of the gastroepiploic. We published in the April issue of the Annals of Thoracic Surgery, and we showed the clear advantage of survival benefit in a propensity matched group, off-pump, using bilateral mammary arteries, and for the RCA using GEA in a skeletonized fashion, compared to saphenous vein. I have a question. What is the way of selecting the targeting portion for the GEA? You spoke about the stenosis. I really feel the same way. I mean, the diameter of the coronary lesion really matters, not the percentage of stenosis. And the GEA, I think there are various methods of how to prepare the conduit, such as the skeletonizing method. I really want to hear a comment from you. Dr Glineur: Well, in this series, which of course is a historical series, we did not skeletonize the gastroepiploic artery. Now, today, if we decide to use the three in situ arterial grafts, I think we will try to perhaps not skeletonize it, as Dr Buxton has shown it, but we will clearly try to have, let’s say, a less fatty gastroepiploic artery. But I would like to make a comment on what you were saying, David. We don’t systematically have to try to do a complete arterial revascularization on all patients, because if you are just systematic and try to do this all the time, it won’t work. It all depends on the coronary lesion severity. I think that the most powerful index of arterial graft function is the coronary lesion. Of course, if you have very narrowed coronary arteries all over the heart, then your full arterial revascularization will work. But if you have, let’s say, 60 to 70% stenosis and if you use a Y graft configuration, clearly this configuration won’t function properly. You will have some reverse flow, some balance flow. And so I think the major preoperative factor is the severity of the lesion. Dr Asai: To answer Professor Taggart’s question, we use a vein graft for the 60–70% stenosis. Dr Taggart: My practice would be the same. I would definitely not put an arterial graft, radial or mammary, on anything but less than a 60% stenosis. Dr J. Grunenfelder (Zurich, Switzerland): I have a question regarding the age. If, for instance, you have a 55-year-old patient and the cardiologist actually referred the patient for full arterial revascularization and the stenoses are in a few locations, not very tight, would you still do the full arterial revascularization? Dr Glineur: Well, it does not function, so I won’t do it. If you have a 65% stenosis on a 4 mm right coronary artery, you can place all the arterial grafts you want, it won’t function. Your arterial graft will have reverse flow, balance flow or can even be occluded. So in this situation, even if the patient is 55 years old, the only way to have a functional graft is to place a vein, definitely.