General Practitioners' KAP Questionnaire on Anticoagulation in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Delphi Method
Shasha YE,Zhigang PAN,Wanwan LIU,Lingping ZHU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.295
2018-01-01
Chinese General Practice
Abstract:Objective To construct a general practitioners' Knowledge-Attitude-Practice questionnaire(referred as KAP questionnaire)for anticoagulant therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation(NVAF),and to lay a foundation for the evaluation of knowledge,attitude and clinical practice among general practitioners in communities in anticoagulation for NVAF patients.Methods Based on the knowledge-attitude-practice model,an initial KAP questionnaire was formed from October 2017 to January 2018 by searching a large number of domestic and foreign literatures,guidelines for atrial fibrillation (AF)management,and foreign questionnaires about AF.74 entries were divided into three dimensions:knowledge(including entries C1-C24),attitude(including entries D1-D27),and practice(including entries E1-E23).The Delphi expert consultation questionnaires were sent to expert panel by e-mail.The completion period was 1 week.Two rounds of letter consultation were conducted,with an interval of 4-8 weeks.After the first round consultation,the research group summarized and sorted out expert suggestions,modified the initial KAP questionnaire,and formed the second round consultation.The experts were consulted again,and their opinions tended to be consistent.Their suggestions were summarized and sorted out,and finally KAP questionnaire was determined and formed.Basic information,enthusiasm,suggestion for revisions,degrees of authority, concentration and coordination about experts were recorded in our study.Results In the first round consultation,15 Delphi expert consultation questionnaires were sent out,and 15 valid questionnaires were collected,with an effective recovery rate of 100.0%.In the second round,15 Delphi questionnaires were sent out,14 valid questionnaires were collected,with an effective recovery rate of 93.3%.The positive coefficient of the expert in the first round consultation was 100.0%,and in the second round consultation was 93.3%.The results of the first round consultation showed that the experts had six suggestions.After the discussion of the research group,C3,C5,C11,C17,C23 and C24 were deleted in the knowledge dimension of initial KAP questionnaire, and other 18 items were saved.D1,D12,D14,D15,D16,D19 and D20 were deleted in the attitude dimension,remaining 21 entries.E3,E6,E8 and E11 were deleted in the behavioral dimension,remaining 19 items.Reserved items were modified according to expert opinions.The results of the second round consultation showed that experts had three suggestions:to merge D6 and D7,D8 and D9,and D22 and D23,adjust initial KAP questionnaire items and delete C22 and E10.The expert authority coefficient(Cr)was 0.87.The concentration degree of expert opinions in the knowledge dimension of initial KAP questionnaire was 3.93 to 4.89 points in the first round consultation,and 4.31 to 4.98 points in the second round consultation.The concentration degree of expert opinions in the attitude dimension was 3.45 to 4.76 points in the first round and 4.19 to 4.94 points in the second round.The concentration degree of expert opinions in the practice dimension was 3.80 to 4.93 points in the first round and 4.15 to 4.91 points in the second round.The coefficient of variation(CV)of knowledge dimension in the initial KAP questionnaire was 0.06 to 0.32 in the first round,and 0.02 to 0.10 in the second round.CV of attitude dimension was 0.09 to 0.47 in the first round,and 0.03 to 0.10 in the second round.CV of practice dimension was 0.04 to 0.38 in the first round and 0.03 to 0.10 in the second round. The W value of first round consultation was 0.221,and significance test χ2was 241.554,P<0.001.The W value of second round consultation was 0.403,and significance test χ2was 321.699,P<0.001.Conclusion The KAP questionnaire constructed in our study includes 3 dimensions of knowledge,attitude and practice,with a total of 52 items.Statistical analysis shows that the positive coefficient and authority of experts are high,the opinions are concentrated,and the results of consultation is scientific, valid and reliable.