Abstract:In type 1 diabetes management, the availability of algorithms capable of accurately forecasting future blood glucose (BG) concentrations and hypoglycemic episodes could enable proactive therapeutic actions, e.g., the consumption of carbohydrates to mitigate, or even avoid, an impending critical event. The only input of this kind of algorithm is often continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor data, because other signals (such as injected insulin, ingested carbs, and physical activity) are frequently unavailable. Several predictive algorithms fed by CGM data only have been proposed in the literature, but they were assessed using datasets originated by different experimental protocols, making a comparison of their relative merits difficult. The aim of the present work was to perform a head-to-head comparison of thirty different linear and nonlinear predictive algorithms using the same dataset, given by 124 CGM traces collected over 10 days with the newest Dexcom G6 sensor available on the market and considering a 30-min prediction horizon. We considered the state-of-the art methods, investigating, in particular, linear black-box methods (autoregressive; autoregressive moving-average; and autoregressive integrated moving-average, ARIMA) and nonlinear machine-learning methods (support vector regression, SVR; regression random forest; feed-forward neural network, fNN; and long short-term memory neural network). For each method, the prediction accuracy and hypoglycemia detection capabilities were assessed using either population or individualized model parameters. As far as prediction accuracy is concerned, the results show that the best linear algorithm (individualized ARIMA) provides accuracy comparable to that of the best nonlinear algorithm (individualized fNN), with root mean square errors of 22.15 and 21.52 mg/dL, respectively. As far as hypoglycemia detection is concerned, the best linear algorithm (individualized ARIMA) provided precision = 64%, recall = 82%, and one false alarm/day, comparable to the best nonlinear technique (population SVR): precision = 63%, recall = 69%, and 0.5 false alarms/day. In general, the head-to-head comparison of the thirty algorithms fed by CGM data only made using a wide dataset shows that individualized linear models are more effective than population ones, while no significant advantages seem to emerge when employing nonlinear methodologies.

Predicting Glucose Values: A New Era for Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Enhancing the Capabilities of Continuous Glucose Monitoring With a Predictive App

Clinical Usage and Potential Benefits of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring Predict App

Concept and Implementation of a Novel Continuous Glucose Monitoring Solution With Glucose Predictions on Board

Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Use in Diabetes Management and Possible Future Applications

How to Use Continuous Glucose Monitoring Efficiently in Diabetes Management: Opinions and Recommendations by German Experts on the Status and Open Questions

Glucose values prediction five years ahead with a new framework of missing responses in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, and the use of continuous glucose monitoring technology

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Prediction

Forecasting of Glucose Levels and Hypoglycemic Events: Head-to-Head Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Data-Driven Algorithms Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Only

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Healthy Adults—Possible Applications in Health Care, Wellness, and Sports

Toward Short-Term Glucose Prediction Solely Based on CGM Time Series

Improving blood glucose level predictability using machine learning

Machine Learning based prediction of Glucose Levels in Type 1 Diabetes Patients with the use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data

Convolutional Recurrent Neural Networks for Glucose Prediction

Monitoring Technologies – Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Mobile Technology, Biomarkers of Glycemic Control

Platform for precise, personalised glucose forecasting through continuous glucose and physical activity monitoring and deep learning

Challenges and perspectives in continuous glucose monitoring

Continuous and Intermittent Glucose Monitoring in 2023

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors for Diabetes Management: A Review of Technologies and Applications

Artificial intelligence biosensors for continuous glucose monitoring

Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors by People Without Diabetes: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?