Variation of clinical manifestations according to culprit drugs in DRESS syndrome
Da Woon Sim,Ji Eun Yu,Jiung Jeong,Jae‐Woo Jung,Hye‐Ryun Kang,Dong Yoon Kang,Young Min Ye,Young‐Koo Jee,Sujeong Kim,Jung‐Won Park,Min Gyu Kang,Sae Hoon Kim,Hye‐Kyung Park,Min‐Suk Yang,Gyu‐Young Hur,Jun Kyu Lee,Jeong‐Hee Choi,Yong Eun Kwon,Young‐Il Koh,Korean Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Consortium,Jae-Woo Jung,Hye-Ryun Kang,Young-Koo Jee,Jung-Won Park,Hye-Kyung Park,Min-Suk Yang,Gyu-Young Hur,Jeong-Hee Choi,Young-Il Koh,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4774
2019-05-01
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Abstract:Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare but serious condition that systematically damages various internal organs through T‐cell–mediated immunological drug reactions. We aimed to investigate whether clinical manifestations of DRESS syndrome differ according to culprit drugs.We retrospectively analyzed data from 123 patients with probable/definite DRESS syndrome based on the RegiSCAR criteria (January 2011 to July 2016). The data were obtained from the Korean Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction Registry. Causality was assessed using the World Health Organization‐Uppsala Monitoring Centre criteria. The culprit drugs were categorized as allopurinol, carbamazepine, anti‐tuberculosis drug, vancomycin, cephalosporins, dapsone, and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs.Differences were observed among culprit drugs regarding the frequencies of hepatitis (<i>P</i> P P P P P P
pharmacology & pharmacy,public, environmental & occupational health