Dialysis Outcomes Across Countries and Regions: A Global Perspective From the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas Study

Emily See,Isabelle Ethier,Yeoungjee Cho,Htay Htay,Silvia Arruebo,Fergus J Caskey,Sandrine Damster,Jo-Ann Donner,Vivekanand Jha,Adeera Levin,Masaomi Nangaku,Syed Saad,Marcello Tonelli,Feng Ye,Ikechi G Okpechi,Aminu K Bello,David W Johnson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2024.05.014
2024-05-23
Abstract:Introduction: Kidney failure treated with hemodialysis (HD), or peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a major global health problem that is associated with increased risks of death and hospitalization. This study aimed to compare the incidence and causes of death and hospitalization during the first year of HD or PD among countries. Methods: The third iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) was conducted between June and September 2022. For this analysis, data were obtained from the cross-sectional survey of key stakeholders from ISN-affiliated countries. Results: A total of 167 countries participated in the survey (response rate 87.4%). In 48% and 58% of countries, 1% to 10% of people treated with HD and PD died within the first year, respectively, with cardiovascular disease being the main cause. Access-related infections or treatment withdrawal owing to cost were important causes of death in low-income countries (LICs). In most countries, <30% and <20% of patients with HD and PD, respectively, required hospitalization during the first year. A greater proportion of patients with HD and PD in LICs were hospitalized in the first year than those in high-income countries (HICs). Access-related infection and cardiovascular disease were the commonest causes of hospitalization among patients with HD, whereas PD-related infection was the commonest cause in patients with PD. Conclusion: There is significant heterogeneity in the incidence and causes of death and hospitalization in patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis. These findings highlight opportunities to improve care, especially in LICs where infectious and social factors are strong contributors to adverse outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?