Single and combined effect of polyethylene microplastics (virgin and naturally aged) and cadmium on pakchoi (Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis) under different growth stages

Cong Men,Zhenwen Xie,Kaihe Li,Xin Xing,Zifu Li,Jiane Zuo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175602
2024-08-21
Abstract:To protect agro-systems and food security, study on the effect of microplastics and heavy metals on edible plants is of great significance. Existing studies mostly used virgin microplastics to evaluate their effects on plants, effects of naturally aged microplastics and their combined effects with heavy metals are rarely explored. In this study, single and combined effect of polyethylene microplastics (PE, both virgin and naturally aged) and cadmium (Cd) on pakchoi under seedling and mature stages were analyzed from perspectives of growth inhibition, oxidative damage, nutrition content and soil enzyme activities. Results showed that inhibiting effects of naturally aged PE (PEa) on the growth of pakchoi were stronger than virgin PE (PEv), whereas co-contamination of PEa and Cd was less toxic than that of PEv and Cd. The co-contamination of PE and Cd could inhibit pakchoi dry biomass by over 85 %. Both single and combined contamination of PE and Cd promoted soil fluorescein diacetate hydrolase (FDA) activities, which were 1.11 to 2.04 times of that in control group. Soluble sugar contents under co-contamination of PEa and Cd were 14 % to 22 % higher than those in control group. PEa and PEv showed different effects on oxidative damage of pakchoi. Compared with PEv, catalase (CAT) activities were more sensitive with PEa, whereas PEa had lower effect on superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities. The response of pakchoi to PE and Cd changed with growth stage. Chlorophyll contents in pakchoi under seedling stage were generally higher than those under mature stage. For Cd contaminated soils, PE benefited pakchoi growth under seedling stage, i.e. antagonistic effect between Cd and PE but hindered their growth under mature stage, i.e. synergistic effect. The results unraveled here emphasized PE, especially PEa, could trigger negative effects on agro-systems, whereas PE could be beneficial for heavy metal contaminated agro-systems under specific situations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?