Do Australian fund managers create value ?

Richard Holden
Abstract:I apply a cross-sectional bootstrap resampling technique to explicitly control for luck and the common risk factors that influence the returns of Australian equity mutual funds. I find strong evidence that a small proportion of predominantly small-cap funds exhibit strong performance that cannot be explained by chance or exposure to risk. At the other end of the distribution, I find that the poorest funds perform ‘less worse’ than what is predicted by chance alone, but identify a large number of mediocre funds (e.g. those who perform marginally above their benchmarks) who perform worse than what would be expected solely by chance. I generalise these results to develop a new method to approximate the value created by managed funds, which for the funds included in this study I estimate at $95 million a month, compared to the aggregate net assets under management of $150 billion. The study also calls into question the findings of previous Australian studies—all of which have used a parametric approach to evaluate mutual fund performance leading to a negatively biased number of both outperforming and underperforming funds. The code for all of the empirical work performed in this study was written by Matthew Martineer on Stata. The 113K .do file, as well the three .dta files containing the main results can be downloaded from http://research.economics.unsw.edu.au/richardholden/miscellania/martineer.zip
What problem does this paper attempt to address?