"REAl LIfe" observational study on the effectiveness of Evusheld prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 omicron variants in vaccine non-responder immunocompromised patients (REALISE)

Giuliana Lucia Esposito,Federico Fassio,Daniela Girardi,Erica Picasso,Federica Meloni,Simone Montini,Veronica Codullo,Eleonora Francesca Pattonieri,Irene Defrancesco,Antonio Bianchessi,Monica Calvi,Elena Maria Seminari,Fausto Baldanti,Daniele Lilleri,Viola Novelli,Carlo Marena
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126208
IF: 4.169
2024-10-03
Vaccine
Abstract:Background: Infection by SARS-CoV2 has become a challenge, especially for immunocompromised patients who show a weaker humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine. Tixagevimab+cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a combination of human monoclonal antibodies that can be used for pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent infection or disease by SARS-CoV2. Objectives: Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Evusheld by comparing an Exposed and an Unexposed group. Study design: Immunocompromised patients were enrolled in the Evusheld Group between March and September 2022. All patients had anti-spike IgG antibody levels <260 BAU/ml before administration of Evusheld. Blood samples for serological evaluations were collected, and anti-Spike antibodies were tested. For the Unexposed Group, a serologic test was performed at enrollment and a questionnaire was performed after 6 months. Results: 43 patients received Evusheld pre-exposure prophylaxis and 45 patients not receiving Evusheld were enrolled in the Unexposed group. The median age was 59.0 years in the Evusheld group, and 63.0 in the unexposed group. In the Evusheld group, during the Omicron wave in Italy, 23.3% of subjects developed symptomatic infection compared to 42.2% in the unexposed group. A majority of infections was seen in male respect to female patients. No difference in length of infection between the groups was seen. Antibody level remained higher than the basal threshold at 180 days from enrollment. Conclusions: Evusheld seems to reduce the rate of symptomatic infection in immunocompromised patients. Further data are required to determine whether this prophylaxis may have a longer-lasting effect over time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?