Predicting Durable Clinical Benefits of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nomogram Based on CT Imaging and Immune Type

Liangna Deng,Mingtao Zhang,Kaibo Zhu,Jialiang Ren,Peng Zhang,Yuting Zhang,Mengyuan Jing,Tao Han,Bin Zhang,Junlin Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.07.004
2024-08-16
Abstract:Purpose: To develop a model based on conventional CT signs and the tumor microenvironment immune types (TIMT) to predict the durable clinical benefits (DCB) of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and materials: A total of 205 patients with NSCLC underwent preoperative CT and were divided into two groups: DCB (progression-free survival (PFS) ≥ 18 months) and non-DCB (NDCB, PFS <18 months). The density percentiles of PD-L1 and CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were quantified to estimate the TIMT. Clinical characteristics and conventional CT signs were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to select the most discriminating parameters, construct a predictive model, and visualize the model as a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate prediction performance and clinical utility. Results: Precisely 118 patients with DCB and 87 with NDCB in NSCLC received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. TIMT was statistically different between the DCB and NDCB groups (P < 0.05). Clinical characteristics (neuron-specific enolase, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, Ki-76, and cM stage) and conventional CT signs (spiculation, bubble-like lucency, pleural retraction, maximum diameter, and CT value of the venous phase) varied between the four TIMT groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, clinical characteristics (lymphocyte count [LYMPH] and cM stage) and conventional CT signs (bubble-like lucency and Pleural effusion) differed between the DCB and NDCB groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that TIMT, cM stage, LYMPH, and pleural effusion were independently associated with DCB and were used to construct a nomogram. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combined model was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.64-0.76), with sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.60, respectively. Conclusion: Conventional CT signs and the TIMT offer a promising approach to predicting clinical outcomes for patients treated with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?