Abstract:Purpose: The United States' National Institutes of Health (NIH) have long challenged academia to improve clinical trial enrollment, especially in underrepresented populations; inclusive of geography, age, disability status, racial and ethnic minorities. It has been shown that rural and urban residents enrolled in clinical trials have similar outcomes, yet, rural healthcare systems struggle to provide opportunities to rural residents to participate in clinical trials when infrastructure is limited or unsupportive of research programs and/or research staffing levels are insufficient. To fully address the barriers to clinical trial access in rural areas, it is not adequate to simply open more trials. Community receptivity of research as well as organizational and community capacity must be considered. This project was determined by the Oregon Health and Science University's Institutional Review Board to be generalizable research across the chosen counties and was approved to operate under a waiver of written consent. Participants received a cash incentive in appreciation for their time and verbally agreed to participate after reviewing a project information sheet. Methods: The research team co-created a community-responsive approach to the receipt, review, and acceptance of clinical trials in a rural community setting. An adapted 5 step Implementation Mapping approach was used to develop a systematic strategy intended to increase the success, and therefore, the number of clinical trials offered in a rural community. Results: The research team and participating rural community members pilot-tested the implementation of a co-designed research review strategy, inclusive of a Regional Cultural Landscape and three co-created project submission and feasibility review forms, with a cancer early detection clinical trial. The proposed clinical trial required engagement from primary care and oncology. Utilizing the research review strategy demonstrated strong researcher-community stakeholder communication and negotiation, which resulted in early identification and resolution of potential barriers, hiring a local clinical research coordinator, and timely trial opening. Conclusion: To the knowledge of the research team, the work described is the first to use a community-engaged approach for creating a clinical trial implementation strategy directly supportive of rural-sitting community stakeholders in receiving, reviewing, and approving cancer-related clinical trials in their community. Participating community members and leaders had the chance to negotiate research protocol changes or considerations directly with researchers interested in conducting a cancer clinical trial in their rural setting.

Effective medical treatment for common baldness in women

Factors Affecting Post-trial Sustainment or De-implementation of Study Interventions: A Narrative Review

Rural research capacity: a co-created model for research success

Every mistake is a treasure: Lessons learned from the TRIANGLE trial for anorexia nervosa

Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations

Spatial Modelling and Prediction Assessment of Soil Iron Using Kriging Interpolation with pH as Auxiliary Information

Practitioner perspectives on equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and control

A Translational Case Study of a Multisite COVID-19 Public Health Intervention Across Sequenced Research Trials: Embedding Implementation in a Community Engagement Phased Framework

Towards achieving transnational research partnership equity: lessons from implementing adaptive platform trials in low- and middle-income countries

Understanding implementation of findings from trial method research: a mixed methods study applying implementation frameworks and behaviour change models

Recruiting and retaining service agencies and public health providers in longitudinal studies: Implications for community-engaged implementation research

The implementation of Journeying through Dementia: Strategies to run a successful pragmatic multicenter trial of a complex intervention

CORPORATE PERSPECTIVES OF A NATIONAL NURSING HOME PRAGMATIC TRIAL AND FACTORS AFFECTING IMPLEMENTATION FIDELITY

Learning from OCTET - exploring the acceptability of clinical trials management methods

Garcinol sensitizes human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells to gemcitabine in association with microRNA signatures.

Pragmatic Trials in Long‐Term Care: Implementation and Dissemination Challenges and Opportunities

Conducting Comparative Effectiveness, Multisite Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning Trials: Lessons Learned and Future Directions From PCORI-Funded Studies

A New Many-Valued Logic and its Application to Approximate Reasoning

Legacy lessons from the COVID-19 era to improve trial participation and retention: Views from trial participants, PPIE contributors and trial staff across the NIHR portfolio

Validation of Immune-Complex Enzyme Immunoassays for Diagnosis of Pneumococcal Pneumonia among Adults in Kenya

Randomised clinical trial research within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health services: a qualitative study