Abstract:Many public environmental decisions are wicked problems due to high complexity and uncertainty. We test a participatory value-based framework based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to tackle such problems. Our framework addresses two important gaps identified in reviews of MCDA applications to environmental problems: including stakeholders and treating uncertainty. We applied our framework in two complex real-world cases concerning a paradigm shift in the wastewater sector; the transition from centralized wastewater systems to decentralized non-grid systems. Non-grid systems may solve some problems of centralized systems by reducing costs, increasing flexibility, and addressing growing demands on environmental issues, especially in rural areas. But non-grid systems have rarely been implemented in OECD countries, because it is unclear whether a transition is recommendable, and whether stakeholders would accept this shift. This problem allows addressing several fundamental research questions. As theoretical contribution, we found that stakeholder participation in MCDA is necessary, because different preferences of stakeholders can lead to different best-performing options in the assessments. Compared to the typical integrated assessment (IA) approach that excludes stakeholders' preferences, the MCDA process led to clearer outcomes. Results indicate that including the uncertainty of predicted consequences of options with Monte Carlo simulation helped discriminate between options and identify best-performing options. Challenging the uncertainty of elicited stakeholder preferences with sensitivity analyses, we found that best-performing options were especially sensitive to the MCDA aggregation model. Despite the high uncertainty, it was possible to suggest robust consensus options that would perform reasonably well for all stakeholders. As practical contribution, results indicated that a transition from the centralized to decentralized non-grid systems seems feasible. Most stakeholders assigned highest weights to environmental protection objectives in decision-making workshops. These stakeholder preferences implemented in MCDA led to a generally better assessment of innovative non-grid systems, especially when including urine source separation. Stakeholders perceived the MCDA process as beneficial and found results plausible. We conclude that the proposed participatory value-based framework is rigorous, but still feasible in practice. The framework is certainly transferable to any context and is open to testing and refinement in various applications to wicked decision problems.

Dynamic marginal cost curves to support water resources management

Cost-effectiveness analysis of risk-reduction measures to reach water safety targets

A participatory system dynamics model to investigate sustainable urban water management in Ebbsfleet Garden City

A participatory multi-criteria decision analysis framework reveals transition potential towards non-grid wastewater management

Comparing the Economic and Environmental Effects of Different Water Management Schemes Using a Coupled Agent–Hydrologic Model

System dynamics modelling coupled with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) for sustainability-related policy analysis and decision-making in the built environment

Social cost of carbon: A revisit from a systems analysis perspective

To charge or to cap in agricultural water management. Insights from modular iterative modeling for the assessment of bilateral micro-macro-economic feedback links

A Fuzzy-Stochastic Modeling Approach for Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis of Coupled Groundwater-Agricultural Systems

Cost-Benefit Analysis and Uncertainty Analysis of Water Loss Reduction Measures: Case Study of the Gothenburg Drinking Water Distribution System

A dynamic model for exploring water-resource management scenarios in an inland arid area: Shanshan County, Northwestern China

A dynamic water resources management approach in Beijing using system dynamics model

Bridging the gap: a new module for human water use in the Community Earth System Model version 2.2.1

Quantifying economic-social-environmental trade-offs and synergies of water-supply constraints: An application to the capital region of China

Assessing Water Management Strategies in Data-Scarce Mountain Regions under Uncertain Climate and Socio-Economic Changes

Sociohydrology modeling for complex urban environments in support of integrated land and water resource management practices

Enabling Efficiency-Driven and Low-Impact Water Management from Robust Decision Making: A Risk- and Robustness-Based Multi-Objective Decision Support Model

Evaluating Distributed Policies for Conjunctive Surface Water‐Groundwater Management in Large River Basins: Water Uses Versus Hydrological Impacts

System Dynamics-based Carbon Footprint Assessment of Industrial Water and Energy Use

An Integrated Multicriteria Analysis Tool for Evaluating Water Resource Management Strategies

Quantifying the Value of Technology and Policy Innovation in Water Resource Portfolios