Abstract:In this article, we use intra‐specific variability in elasmobranchs as a case study to introduce a stepwise approach for studying animal movement drivers that is based on a context‐dependence framework. Ultimately, incorporating behavioural variability in the study of movement drivers can assist in making predictions about behavioural responses to environmental change, overcoming tagging biases and establishing more efficient conservation measures. Despite its consequences for ecological processes and population dynamics, intra‐specific variability is frequently overlooked in animal movement studies. Consequently, the necessary resolution to reveal drivers of individual movement decisions is often lost as animal movement data are aggregated to infer average or population patterns. Thus, an empirical understanding of why a given movement pattern occurs remains patchy for many taxa, especially in marine systems. Nonetheless, movement is often rationalized as being driven by basic life history requirements, such as acquiring energy (feeding), reproduction, predator‐avoidance, and remaining in suitable environmental conditions. However, these life history requirements are central to every individual within a species and thus do not sufficiently account for the high intra‐specific variability in movement behavior and hence fail to fully explain the occurrence of multiple movement strategies within a species. Animal movement appears highly context dependent as, for example, within the same location, the behavior of both resident and migratory individuals is driven by life history requirements, such as feeding or reproduction, however different movement strategies are utilized to fulfill them. A systematic taxa‐wide approach that, instead of averaging population patterns, incorporates and utilizes intra‐specific variability to enable predictions as to which movement patterns can be expected under a certain context, is needed. Here, we use intra‐specific variability in elasmobranchs as a case study to introduce a stepwise approach for studying animal movement drivers that is based on a context‐dependence framework. We examine relevant literature to illustrate how this context‐focused approach can aid in reliably identifying drivers of a specific movement pattern. Ultimately, incorporating behavioral variability in the study of movement drivers can assist in making predictions about behavioral responses to environmental change, overcoming tagging biases, and establishing more efficient conservation measures.

Modelling individual variability in habitat selection and movement using integrated step‐selection analysis

Methods for implementing integrated step-selection functions with incomplete data

Step selection analysis with non-linear and random effects in mgcv

Step selection functions with non‐linear and random effects

Animal Movement Tools (amt): R-Package for Managing Tracking Data and Conducting Habitat Selection Analyses

How to account for behavioral states in step-selection analysis: a model comparison

Linking resource selection and step selection models for habitat preferences in animals

Understanding step selection analysis through numerical integration

Inference in MCMC step selection models

A review of statistical models used to characterize species-habitat associations with animal movement data

A ‘How to’ guide for interpreting parameters in habitat‐selection analyses

The Statistical Building Blocks of Animal Movement Simulations

Predicting local and non-local effects of resources on animal space use using a mechanistic step selection model

Combining animal interactions and habitat selection into models of space use: a case study with white‐tailed deer

What is the animal doing? Tools for exploring behavioural structure in animal movements

Time‐varying habitat selection analysis: A model and applications for studying diel, seasonal, and post‐release changes

Predicting fine-scale distributions and emergent spatiotemporal patterns from temporally dynamic step selection simulations

Unveiling the roles of temporal periodicity, the spatial environment and behavioural modes in terrestrial animal movement

Effects of the social environment on movement-integrated habitat selection

The role of context in elucidating drivers of animal movement