COVID-19 seropositive donors yield comparable post-lung transplant outcomes

Chitaru Kurihara,Taisuke Kaiho,Takahide Toyoda,Benjamin Thomae,Anne O'Boye,Jeffrey Lysne,Ankit Bharat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-496

2024-07-30

Abstract:Background: Recent reports have suggested that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection can cause pneumonitis even in the absence of clinical symptoms and COVID-19 associated pulmonary inflammation can persist resulting in long-term fibrosis. This single-center study utilized standardized immunological testing to determine whether lungs from COVID-19 seropositive donors, indicative of past COVID-19 infection, can be safely used for clinical transplantation. Methods: The study included 90 consecutive lung transplant procedures incorporating donor serological testing for past COVID-19 infection. Donors were negative for active COVID-19 infection and met institutional criteria to be used for lung transplantation. The outcomes of lung transplant recipients were compared between donors with and without serological evidence of past COVID-19 infection. Results: No significant difference was found in post-transplant survival rates between recipients of lungs obtained from donors with serological evidence compared to those without. Additionally, there were no significant differences in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 rates or other post-transplant clinical parameters, such as operative time, ischemic time, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that lungs from COVID-19 seropositive donors, but not active COVID-19 infection are safe and feasible for transplantation, yielding comparable post-transplant outcomes to donors who are negative COVID-19 antibodies. This study supports the utilization of lungs from donors with historic COVID-19 infection as long as they meet current transplant criteria, potentially addressing the concerns related to the use of such organs.