Custom Endoprosthesis-Assisted Pediatric Microsurgical Jaw Reconstruction
Collean Trotter,Devon O’Brien,Eloise W. Stanton,Idean Roohani,Pasha Shakoori,Mark M. Urata,Jeffrey A. Hammoudeh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010426
2024-07-02
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Abstract:Surgical treatment of pediatric maxillary and mandibular tumors can cause significant postresection disfigurement, mastication, and speech dysfunction. The need to restore form and function without compromising growth at the recipient and donor sites poses a particular reconstructive dilemma. This study evaluates outcomes of the custom endoprosthesis (CE) compared with noncustom reconstruction (NCR) and introduces an algorithm using CE to optimize available soft tissue reconstructive options. An Institutional Review Board–approved retrospective review of all patients undergoing maxillary or mandibular reconstruction between 2016 and 2022 was completed. The independent variable of interest was CE utilization. Primary outcomes of interest included hardware failure/removal or exposure, major complications, and revision surgeries. Covariates of interest included patient demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor size, and pathologic diagnosis. Statistical analyses including independent t test, χ 2 analyses, and univariate/multivariate logistic regression were performed using RStudio version 4.2.1. Fifty-one patients (37 mandible and 14 maxilla) underwent CE or NCR. Of patients, 37% (n = 19) received CE. Of patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction, there were significantly lower rates of hardware exposure (14.3% versus 47.8%, P = 0.018), failure (7.1% versus 43.5%, P = 0.048), major complications (28.6% versus 78.2%, P = 0.008), and revisions (11.1% versus 50.0%, P = 0.002) in the CE cohort compared with the NCR cohort. The rates of hardware failure, exposure, major complications, and revisions did not significantly differ in maxillary reconstructions, however, CE successfully reconstructed significantly larger defects (179.5 versus 74.6 cm 3 , P = 0.020) than NCRs. Deviating from NCR, the authors propose an algorithm considering anatomical location, extent of resection, and patient age for soft tissue selection. This algorithm yielded improved mandibular reconstructive outcomes and no increase in complications rate in maxillary reconstruction despite larger resection defects. Furthermore, the authors’ initial findings demonstrate that CE is a safe option for pediatric maxillary and mandibular reconstruction that may, in addition, facilitate improved form and function.
surgery