Using electrodermal activity to estimate fear learning differences in anxiety: A multiverse analysis

Matthew D Greaves,Kim L Felmingham,Luke J Ney,Emma L Nicholson,Stella Li,Bram Vervliet,Ben J Harrison,Bronwyn M Graham,Trevor Steward
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2024.104598
Abstract:Meta-analyses indicate differences in Pavlovian fear responses between anxious and non-anxious individuals using electrodermal activity (EDA). Recent research, however, has cast doubt on whether these effects are robust to different analytic choices. Using the multiverse approach conceived by Steegen et al. (2016), we surveyed analytic choices typically implemented in clinical fear conditioning research by conducting 1240 analyses reflecting different choice permutations. Only 1.45% of our analyses produced theoretically congruent statistically significant effects, and the strength and direction of the estimated effects varied substantially across EDA processing methods. We conclude that EDA-estimated fear learning differences are vulnerable to researcher degrees of freedom and make recommendations regarding which analytical choices should be approached with a high degree of caution.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?