Abstract:Background Limiting the marginal bone loss is a prerequisite for long-term stability of implants. Previous studies have evaluated the factors affecting marginal bone loss, including the mucous thickness, the depth of placement. The biologic width will form when the implants are uncovered, which unvaryingly exposes the bone around the implant neck to the oral cavity and starts bone loss, and the biologic width is formed by dissected mucous and the depth of placement of implant at initial stage. Aim/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of the mucous thickness, the depth of placement and the initial biologic width on the marginal bone loss. Material and Methods The clinical and radiographic data of 181 delayed-loaded Ankylos Implants in 140 patients were collected after 1–5 years follow-up. The radiographic examination was taken after implant placement, before the second stage surgery, and after 1–5 years follow-up. The mucous thickness, the depth of placement and crestal bone loss were calculated medially and distally. The initial biologic width was defined as either the thickness of the mucous when the implant was positioned supracrestally, or the sum of the thickness of the mucous and the depth of the implant when the implant was placed below the bone level. Implants were divided into 3 groups based on the initial biologic width, Group A (width less than 3 mm, include 3 mm), Group B (between 3 mm and 4 mm, include 4 mm), and Group C (width more than 4 mm). Significance was set to 0.05. Results Implants in Group A had 0.4(0.1.0) mm bone loss mesially and 0.3(0.0.8) mm distally. For Group B, the bone loss values were m- 0.3(0.0.8) mm and d- 0.3(0.0.7) mm. Group C implants experienced bone loss of m- 0.7(0.2.1.1) mm and d- 0.6(0.1.1.0) mm. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to find differences between groups. There was significant difference between groups (P = 0.011). Kruskal-Wallis test for implants placed below, at, or above the bone level yielded a statistically significant difference (P = 0.000). The calculation of Spearman's correlation coefficient between the mucous thickness and the marginal bone loss shows negative correlation (rs=−0.243, P = 0.001), while the depth of placement and the marginal bone loss show the positive correlation (rs=0.477, P = 0.000). Conclusions and Clinical Implications The crestal bone loss was found to be the positively correlated to the depth of placement and had negative correlated to the mucous thickness. The result may suggest that the closer the initial biologic width is to the final biologic width, the less bone loss is, and if the initial biologic width is not adequate, bone loss may occur to ensure the proper development of biologic width.

Influence of gingival phenotype on crestal bone loss at implants : A long-term 2 to 20-year cohort study in periodontally compromised patient

A Retrospective Study of 30,959 Implants: Risk Factors Associated with Early and Late Implant Loss

Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Crestal Bone Loss‐ a Clinical Retrospective Study of 1–5 Years

Analysis of Implant Loss Risk Factors after Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration: A Retrospective Study of 5404 Dental Implants

Investigation of the Clinical Effects of Peri-Implant Gingival Morphology on Tissue Health

The Effect of Initial Biologic Width on Marginal Bone Loss: A Retrospective Study.

Clinical outcomes of dental implants in patients with and without history of periodontitis: A 20-year prospective study

How do the dimensions of peri‐implant mucosa affect marginal bone loss in equicrestal and subcrestal position of implants? A 1‐year clinical trial

The Use of Two-Piece Transmucosal Implants Designed with a Convergent Neck: A 6-Year Clinical Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Impact on Soft and Hard Tissues

Assessment of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues Conditions around Short and Ultra-Short Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A 3-Year Retrospective Study on Periodontally Healthy Patients and Patients with a History of Periodontal Disease

A 10‐year Retrospective Clinical Study to Identify Risk Indicators for Peri‐Implant Bone Loss and Implant Failure

A retrospective study on 1592 consecutively performed operations in one private referral clinic. Part I: Early inflammation and early implant failures

Impact of bone defect morphology on the outcome of reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis

The influence of implant depth, abutment height and mucosal phenotype on peri‑implant bone levels: A 2-year clinical trial

Marginal Bone and Keratinized Mucosa Alterations Around Sloped Implants Placed in Healed Sloped Crests: A Long-Term Cohort Study

Incidence and prevalence of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis 17 to 23 (18.9) years postimplant placement.

The long‐term impact of alveolar ridge preservation with xenograft bone mineral on peri‐implant health after 5 years in function: A retrospective cohort study of 108 patients assessed clinically and radiologically

Short and ultra‐short (<6‐mm) locking‐taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas (part II): A 5‐year retrospective study on periodontally healthy patients and patients with a history of periodontitis

Hygienic maintenance in patients with maxillae atrophy and in oncological patients with maxillary resection rehabilitated with zygomatic implants: A nested monocentric prospective cohort study

Marginal Bone Level Changes Evaluation of Long-term Functional Dental Implants with the Implant Disease Risk Assessment Diagram: A 2 to 6 Years Follow-up Retrospective Study

[A Prospective Cohort Study on the Effect of Implant Restoration Following Micro Crestal Flap-Alveolar Ridge Preservation at Molar Extraction Sockets with Severe Periodontitis].