THE MECHANISM OF ANAPHYLAXIS

H. Dale

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1924.tb66108.x

1924-12-01

Abstract:ALTHOUGH it is over a quarterof a century ago since Charles Richet published his classical work on anaphylaxisand the amountof researchthat has been undertakensince that date on this subject, has beenenormous.the definition of the term still varies considerablyaccording to the views of the writers. At one time almost every biological reaction associatedwith some degree of shock was regardedas an anaphylacticphenomenon,whether the reaction were a manifestation of hypersensibility or not. Richet limited the term to a state of increased susceptibility induced in an animal by a sensitizinginjection of a proteid substance. Rosenauand Anderson,Arthus, Otto and all the early workers adheredstrictly to Richet's conceptionof the phenomenonand studied it only when the shock resulted from the injection of a protein in a previously sensitizedanimal or when the shockfollowed the injection of a mixture of the protein and the serumof a sensitizedanimal (pas-' sive anaphylaxis). It only introducesunnecessary confusion to endeavourto find a solution of the mechanism underlying the phenomenon from observationsof otherforms of toxic shock. nomatter how closely the symptoms simulate those of anaphylaxis. It has long been known that the sensitizing dose calls forth a biological responsein tho form of an immune body and that the shock if! the toxic symptomof a combinationof this immune body and the originating protein. On the basisof this various workers have built up hIPothesesto explain the mechanism. There is aifference of opinion as to whether the amboceptoror immune body is sessileor free. As thecharacteristicsymptoms of anaphylactic shock are supposedto be localized in the nervoussystem,in the lungs or in certain viscera, those who support the cellular responsewith fixed receptors,have postulatedthe nerve cells, the muscle cells of the bronchi or the cells ofperipheralorgansas thesite of sensitization. Dale adducedevidence of acellular site of the receptors. He washedout the uteri of virgin guineapigs through the abdominal aorta and after removal of the organsand immersion in Ringer's solution, brought them into contact with horse serum. No contractionswere recorded of the normal guinea pig's uterus, but prompt contraction followed of the uterusof a guineapig previouslysensitizedwith horse serum. Coca'sexperimentsconfirmed Dale's findings. Dr. I. L. Kritschevskyhassoughtduringthe pastsix yearsto explain the phenomenaof anaphylaxis andof deathas aresultof a changein the degree of dispersionof the colloids of the organism.Having satisfiedhimself that this view is correct,he andDr. O. G. Birger endeavourto ascertainwhether the changeddispersiontakesplacein the colloids of the blood or inthecolloids of the protoplasmof thecells.' For this purpose theyfound it necessaryto remove entirely the blood of an animal and to substitute for it a crystalloidal fluid. This is impossible in warm-bloodedanimals,but it can be achievedin a "salt frog." In their experimentsthe blood was washedout throughthe inferior ven-a cava by means of Ringer's solution or of Ringer-Locke'ssolution. They found that thirty-two salt frogs out of a total of fifty-three survivedthe experimentfor morethan twenty-four hours. Those animals which survived as a rule did not differ from normal animalsimme: diately after the substitution of the crystalloidal fluid. In the next place they tested the effect of intravenous injections of the serum of warmblooded animals, of the juice of Ootyledon scbeidecker! and of an acid solution of arseno-benzol. The authorsclaim that thesethree substancesproduce the same symptom complex in warm-blooded animalsandpostulatethe hypothesisthat the shock mechanismis the same. In the salt frog the symptom complex induced is also the same nomatter which of the three is employed. In the normal salt frog pinching of the skin with forceps calls forth an immediateandenergeticstart. After the poisoning the frog either does not react at all or if the