Comparing glaucoma risk in children receiving low-dose and high-dose glucocorticoid treatment after cataract surgery

Diana Chabané Schmidt,Torben Martinussen,Ameenat Lola Solebo,Dorte Ancher Larsen,Daniella Bach-Holm,Line Kessel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16746
2024-08-12
Abstract:Purpose: Treatment with glucocorticoids following paediatric cataract surgery is crucial to prevent inflammation, but may lead to secondary glaucoma, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. We wish to compare glaucoma outcomes following high-dose and low-dose glucocorticoid treatment after paediatric cataract surgery. Methods: This cohort study included Danish children undergoing cataract surgery before 10 years of age, receiving either a low-dose or high-dose postoperative glucocorticoid treatment. Case identification and collection of a standardized dataset were retrospective, from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2016, and prospective thereafter, until 31 December 2021. High-dose treatment included 0.5-1.0 mg subconjunctival depot dexamethasone or methylprednisolone, followed by 6-8 drops of dexamethasone for 1 week, tapered by one drop weekly. Low-dose treatment included 6 drops for 3 days, followed by 3 drops for 18 days. Sustained (>3 months) ocular hypertension or glaucoma was compared between the two groups. Results: Overall, 267 children (388 eyes) were included in the study. Ninety-five children (133 eyes) had received high-dose treatment and had a median follow-up time of 89 months (IQR: 57.2-107.4), while 173 children (255 eyes) had received the low-dose treatment and had a median follow-up time of 40.5 months (IQR: 22.9-60.4). Survival curves showed a lower risk of glaucoma in the low-dose group for children with axial lengths ≥18 mm. Conclusion: Low-dose glucocorticoid treatment was associated with a lower risk of glaucoma in children with axial lengths ≥18 mm. The same effect was not observed in children with shorter eyes. High-dose glucocorticoid should be limited in children undergoing cataract surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?