Dietary factors and postprandial lipaemia
K. Frayn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114598001469
1998-11-01
British Journal Of Nutrition
Abstract:When we eat a meal containing, say, 100 g carbohydrate, the glucose that is absorbed enters a pool of free glucose in the body of about 12 g. It does not, however, lead to an 8-fold increase in the plasma glucose concentration because coordinated mechanisms come into play that suppress the entry of endogenous glucose into the plasma, and stimulate the removal of glucose from plasma (Fery et al.1990). It is not always appreciated that exactly the same arguments can be applied to fat metabolism. A typical intake of dietary fat for those of us eating Western diets is about 100 g/d. About 95 % of this is in the form of triacylglycerol (TG). Therefore we eat about 30–50 g fat in a notional ‘typical’ meal, depending, of course, on how we distribute the fat intake amongst our daily meals. The amount of TG circulating in the plasma is approximately 3 g (taking a typical plasma TG concentration as 1 mmol/l). Therefore, a superficial analysis suggests that the plasma TG concentration will increase 10fold after a meal. In fact, in healthy people the rise is usually considerably less than 2-fold. This is, again, because the ingestion of a meal sets in train a series of co-ordinated changes in fat metabolism that tend both to suppress the entry of endogenous TG into the plasma, and to increase TG disposal from the plasma (Frayn, 1993). The magnitude of the increase in plasma TG following a meal (postprandial lipaemia) is now recognized to be an important risk marker for CHD (Groot et al. 1991; Patsch et al. 1992). Impaired postprandial lipid metabolism (increased postprandial lipaemia) seems to be a feature of the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype, the dyslipidaemic phenotype associated with insulin resistance (Griffin & Zampelas, 1995; Jeppesent al. 1995b), which is a much more prevalent factor underlying CHD than is simple elevation of the plasma cholesterol concentration (Lamarche et al. 1995). Few would argue that elevated TG concentrations themselves have direct atherogenic potential; it seems more likely that they are a marker for some underlying disturbance of lipid metabolism. In principle, disruption of any aspect of the co-ordinated response discussed earlier might lead to alterations in postprandial lipaemia. The associated risk of CHD appears to be related to the persistence in the circulation of remnant particles derived from the chylomicrons that carry the dietary TG into the plasma (Karpe et al. 1994): these may represent the actual ‘atherogenic particle’ (Havel, 1994; Weintraubet al. 1996). There is, therefore, great interest in understanding the factors that contribute to determination of plasma TG concentrations in the postprandial state. Many factors are known to influence the magnitude of postprandial lipaemia, including age and sex (Cohn et al. 1988), obesity (Lewis et al. 1990) and diabetes (Akanji et al. 1992), and the amount of fat in the test meal (Dubois et al. 1998). The presence of sucrose or fructose in the test meal also substantially potentiates the response (Cohen & Schall, 1988; Jeppesen et al. 1995a; Abrahaet al. 1998). These factors all affect the response quantitatively rather than qualitatively. In most studies it is found that dietary TG enters the circulation relatively slowly (compared with glucose from dietary carbohydrate), plasma TG concentrations reaching a peak somewhere between 2 and 5 h following a fat-rich meal. It is common to imagine a smooth, single peak in plasma TG concentration as is usually seen in figures in papers examining this process. However, graphs of mean values can often hide variations in the shapes of curves between and within individual subjects. Although some studies specifically report that the shape of the curve was monophasic in individual subjects (e.g. Potts et al. 1994), in other studies a variety of types of curve, with from one to three peaks, has been reported (Cohn et al. 1989). In this issue of the Journal, Shishehbor, Roche and Gibney publish the interesting observation that the amount of carbohydrate given with a fixed amount of fat determines whether a monoor biphasic response in plasma TG concentration is observed (Shishehbor et al. 1998). Shishehbor et al. (1998) argue that the pattern of response observed reflects the rate of intestinal absorption of fat. Certainly there are reasons for believing this to be a complex process, open to influence by many factors. Shishehbor et al. (1998) discuss the long-established finding that ingestion of a meal, or even sham-feeding, can liberate into the circulation fat presumed to be previously stored in the small-intestinal wall or the lymphatics (Mendeloff, 1954; Peel t al. 1993; Fielding et al. 1996). The rate of delivery of dietary fat into the circulation must be a function of many processes including intestinal digestion and absorption, the synthesis of chylomicron particles in the enterocyte and their export into the lacteals, and the rate of lymphatic flow. As nutritionists we tend to be ignorant of many of these factors. The findings of Shishehbor et al. (1998) therefore emphasize once again the complexity of events in the postprandial period. Those who undertake further work to elucidate the complex, co-ordinated physiological and metabolic events underlying postprandial lipid metabolism will now have to bear in mind the amount of dietary carbohydrate as a further important determinant of the nature, although not necessarily the magnitude, of postprandial lipaemia.