Should nurse practitioners play a larger role in Canada's health care system?
P. Morgan,L. Cohen
1992-03-15
Abstract:N urse practitioners (NPs) combine the skill of a physician with the caring of a nurse. They can do 90% of what the general practitioner does, at less than half the cost, and sometimes they can do it better. They fill in the chinks of the medical care system, subbing for physicians in remote locations and after sundown. And they are an asset in group medical practice: a randomized trial showed that, in a clinic where they worked with physicians, they were just as effective as the doctors (Spitzer WO, Sackett DL, Sibley JC et al: The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner. N Engl J Med 1974; 290: 251-256). "[We found] there was no difference in the outcomes of families taken care of this way versus families taken care of by GPs alone," says Dr. Walter Spitzer, chairman of the McGill Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the study's principal investigator. Another early evaluator was Harvard's Dr. Robert Lawrence, who helped found one of the first American NP training programs in North Carolina in 1970. He concluded that "NPs can do 90% of what primary care doctors can do." Nevertheless, nurse practitioner training programs were cancelled in the early 1980s and now only about 250 NPs remain in Canada. Even in an era when an excess of cost-producing physicians is well recognized, and despite the support of influential academics, they are still struggling to justify their existence. To a large extent, NPs are victims of a turf war. They have been barred from competing with physicians in the medicare remuneration system. With few exceptions, they cannot bill independently for their services and physicians cannot bill for services performed by NPs (see sidebar). Dr. Michael Rachlis, coauthor of Second Opinion: What's Wrong With Canada's Health Care System and How to Fix It (William Collins Sons & Co. Canada Ltd., Don Mills, Ont., 1989), explains that although more money is being paid to doctors, "they have become cranky . . . and there is less and less money available for other things." Like NPs. Wendy Goodine, president of the country's largest NP organization, the 180-member Nurse Practitioners' Association of Ontario, puts it this way: "So, with government approval, the medical profession has prevented NPs from achieving their full potential in southern Canada in daylight hours. But the doctors are quite happy to let nurses do whatever they want when and where doctors don't want to work. Doctors are very leery about having NPs around because NPs demonstrate in a practical fashion that doctors aren't necessary for a lot of primary care, even a lot of specialty care." The demolition of NP training in the early 1980s can only be understood by considering the tangled logic of the times. "The idea behind NPs came up in the 1 960s when there was a belief that there wouldn't be enough doctors to meet the needs of a growing population," explains Rachlis. Today, the physician population in Canada is growing at an annual rate of about 3%, the rest of the population at a rate of only 1%. "By the 1970s we realized we were producing too many doctors, so there was no point in funding NPs. The programs were all cancelled by the early 1980s." At the same time, according to Goodine, the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) turned its back on the NPs, and decided to pursue a course that would require all nurses to have baccalaureate degrees by the year 2000. Thus, universities concentrated on academic training for graduate nurses. Nevertheless, testimonials for NPs are still coming in. Rachlis is adamant that "there are a lot of things that NPs can do better and cheaper than doctors." "For between $35 000 and $50 000 a year we do general family health, anything from prenatal to elderly care . . . with a large focus on health promotion and prevention," says Shirley Galloway, an NP at the Klinic Community Health Centre in Winnipeg. "I've had patients coming to see me for 6 years, patients who will not see anyone else." On their first visit, patients at her clinic are told that the nurses are NPs and are given information on their educational background and what they can do. Given the choice of seeing an NP or a doctor, patients often choose the NP. Dr. Richard Goldbloom, director of ambulatory care at the Izaak Walton Killam Children's