Sperm concentration remains stable among fertile American men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kieran Lewis,Rossella Cannarella,Fangzhou Liu,Bradley Roth,Leila Bushweller,Jack Millot,Sohei Kuribayashi,Shinnosuke Kuroda,Diego Aguilar Palacios,Sarah C Vij,Jennifer Cullen,Scott D Lundy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.322
2024-08-14
Abstract:Importance: Findings from several high profile meta-analyses have raised concerns about an ongoing global decline in sperm concentration and male fertility. However, these studies exhibit considerable heterogeneity in key variables including study population, methodology, fertility status, and geographic region. Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring temporal trends in sperm concentration among fertile men and men unselected for fertility status in the United States. Data sources: A literature search performed in Scopus and PubMed databases for studies published between 1970 and 2023. Additional studies were included from citations of prior global meta-analyses and reviews evaluating temporal trends in sperm count. Study selection and synthesis: Studies were included if they presented original data on sperm concentration in US men without known infertility from 1970 to 2023. Aggregate data were assessed across all study populations, with additional subgroup analyses stratified by fertility status and US region. Main outcomes: Weighted generalized linear models were generated to evaluate the association between mean sperm concentration and sample collection year. Results: A total of 874 articles were screened, with 58 meeting the inclusion criteria. These represented 75 unique study populations totaling 11,787 men in the United States. Across all study populations, no change in sperm concentration was observed between 1970 and 2018 in unadjusted models (β = 0.14 million/mL per year). When adjusting for US region, no statistically significant decline in sperm concentration was seen. When adjusting for both region and fertility status, a modest annual decline was observed to meet statistical significance (β = -0.35 million/mL per year). Of the 49 study populations reporting adequate data to determine mean total sperm count, there was a significant increase in total sperm count of 2.9 million per year between 1970 and 2018. Subgroup analysis found no statistically significant change in mean sperm concentration among any US census region or fertility status cohort. Conclusion and relevance: In contrast to prior global studies, this analysis suggests no clinically significant decline in sperm concentration among confirmed fertile men and the general male US population without known infertility. Although these findings provide some reassurance against a widespread rapid decline, further studies are necessary to better understand this important topic.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?