Comparison of drug-induced liver injury risk between propylthiouracil and methimazole: A quantitative systems toxicology approach

Qingfeng He,Min Li,Peiying Ji,Aole Zheng,Li Yao,Xiao Zhu,Jae-Gook Shin,Volker M Lauschke,Bing Han,Xiaoqiang Xiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2024.117064
Abstract:Propylthiouracil (PTU) and methimazole (MMI), two classical antithyroid agents possess risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with unknown mechanism of action. This study aimed to examine and compare their hepatic toxicity using a quantitative system toxicology approach. The impact of PTU and MMI on hepatocyte survival, oxidative stress, mitochondrial function and bile acid transporters were assessed in vitro. The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of PTU and MMI were constructed while their risk of DILI was calculated by DILIsym, a quantitative systems toxicology (QST) model by integrating the results from in vitro toxicological studies and PBPK models. The simulated DILI (ALT >2 × ULN) incidence for PTU (300 mg/d) was 21.2%, which was within the range observed in clinical practice. Moreover, a threshold dose of 200 mg/d was predicted with oxidative stress proposed as an important toxic mechanism. However, DILIsym predicted a 0% incidence of hepatoxicity caused by MMI (30 mg/d), suggesting that the toxicity of MMI was not mediated through mechanism incorporated into DILIsym. In conclusion, DILIsym appears to be a practical tool to unveil hepatoxicity mechanism and predict clinical risk of DILI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?