Adapting Artificial Intelligence Concepts to Enhance Clinical Decision-Making: A Hybrid Intelligence Framework
Takanobu Hirosawa,Tomoharu Suzuki,Tastuya Shiraishi,Arisa Hayashi,Yoichi Fujii,Taku Harada,Taro Shimizu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s497753
IF: 2.145
2024-11-27
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Takanobu Hirosawa, 1, &ast Tomoharu Suzuki, 2, &ast Tastuya Shiraishi, 3, &ast Arisa Hayashi, 1, &ast Yoichi Fujii, 4, &ast Taku Harada, 1, 4, &ast Taro Shimizu 1, &ast 1 Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; 2 Department of Hospital Medicine, Urasoe General Hospital, Okinawa, Japan; 3 Higashinihonbashinaika clinic, Tokyo, Japan / Ubie, inc, Tokyo, Japan; 4 General Medicine, Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Takanobu Hirosawa, Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, 880 Kitakobayashi, Mibu-cho, Simotsuga-gun Tochigi, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan, Tel +81-282-86-1111, Fax +81-282-86-4775, Email Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) holds great potential for revolutionizing health care by providing clinicians with data-driven insights that support more accurate and efficient clinical decisions. However, applying AI in clinical settings is often challenging due to the complexity and vastness of medical information. This perspective article explores how AI development methodologies can be adapted to support clinicians in their decision-making processes, emphasizing the importance of a hybrid approach that combines AI capabilities with clinicians' expertise. Patients and Methods: We developed a conceptual framework designed to integrate AI-driven hybrid intelligence into clinical practice to enhance decision-making. This framework focuses on adapting key AI concepts, such as backpropagation, quantization, and avoiding overfitting, to help clinicians better interpret complex medical data and improve diagnosis and treatment planning. Results: Several AI methodologies were adapted to enhance clinical decision-making. First, backpropagation allows clinicians to refine initial assessments by revisiting them as new data emerges, improving diagnostic accuracy over time. Second, quantization helps break down complex medical problems into manageable components, enabling clinicians to prioritize critical elements of care. Finally, avoiding overfitting encourages clinicians to balance rare diagnoses with more common explanations, reducing the risk of diagnostic errors and unnecessary complexity. Conclusion: The integration of AI-driven hybrid intelligence has the potential to enhance clinical decision-making. By adapting AI methodologies, clinicians can enhance their ability to analyze data, prioritize treatments, and make more accurate diagnoses while preserving the essential human aspect of health care. This framework highlights the importance of combining AI's strengths with clinicians' expertise for more effective and balanced decision-making in clinical practice. This perspective highlights the value of hybrid intelligence in achieving more balanced, effective, and patient-centered decision-making in health care. Keywords: artificial intelligence, clinical reasoning, diagnostic accuracy, digital health, internal medicine, natural language processing Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformative technology in various fields, and its potential in medicine is increasingly recognized. 1,2 In health care, AI technologies have been developed to assist health care professionals by analyzing vast amounts of data, thus aiding in diagnosing diseases, predicting patient outcomes, and personalizing treatment plans. 3 Unlike traditional diagnostic tools, AI systems, such as machine learning and deep learning models, are designed to process large datasets and generate insights that would be difficult or time-consuming for humans to obtain. 4 AI's ability to quickly analyze complex data has opened new avenues for enhancing clinician decision-making, especially in fields like radiology, pathology, and precision medicine. 5–8 While AI is proving to be a valuable tool in health care, understanding the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of these tools remains a critical issue. Recent studies highlight the need for robust reporting guidelines for AI in medicine to prevent publication bias and ensure clarity in reporting outcomes. 9 Additionally, systematic reviews have highlighted potential discrepancies between AI and clinician performance, emphasizing the necessity of transparent and reliable AI reporting standards. 10,11 These findings suggest that the implementation of AI in clinical practice must be evidence-based and standardized to provide consistent, safe, and effective care. Generative -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal