Abstract:Background: Cytokine storm is a complex syndrome driven by hyperinflammation leading to multi-organ dysfunction and high mortality rates. Patients with hematological malignancies are susceptible to different types of cytokine storm syndromes (CSS) including those driven by their disease (e.g., malignancy-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (MA-HLH)), treatment toxicities (e.g., cytokine release syndrome (CRS) related to CAR-T) or infections (e.g., COVID associated cytokine storm). The precise nature of the inflammatory mechanisms of different CSS and their impact on clinical outcomes are poorly understood. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the inflammatory marker profiles and survival outcomes of three CSS: CAR-T CRS, MA-HLH and COVID-CS. The cloud-based Foundry platform was used to aggregate and integrate data from patients with hematological malignancies admitted at the MD Anderson Cancer Center between March 2020 and November 2022. Patients in the CAR-T CRS and MA-HLH cohorts met ASTCT Consensus Grading criteria and HLH-2004 criteria respectively. While there are no well-established diagnostic guidelines for COVID-CS, patients in the COVID-CS cohort had laboratory values higher than the upper limit of normal for at least two of C-reactive protein (CRP), Interleukin 6 (IL-6) or Ferritin within 28 days of COVID diagnosis (Table 1). Biomarker datasets were analyzed through regression models and feature selection to determine inflammation patterns across the three cohorts. Survival outcomes were compared across the cohorts and tested for association with biomarkers to determine their prognostic relevance (Figure 1). Results: A total of 671 in-patients met inclusion criteria across the three patient cohorts: CAR-T CRS (220), MA-HLH (224) and COVID-CS (227). The proportions of different disease types differed among the cohorts (Table 1) with aggressive B-cell lymphomas representing the largest group in the CAR-T CRS cohort (62%) whereas leukemia was the most frequent diagnosis in the COVID-CS (45%) and MA-HLH (38%) cohorts. While fever and fatigue were common presenting symptoms of all 3 CSS, the frequencies of more severe symptoms such as hypotension and capillary leak syndrome were increased in patients with MA-HLH. The median length of hospitalization differed significantly (p < 0.001) across the cohorts: MA-HLH (24 days), CAR-T CRS (15 days) and COVID-CS (6 days). The MA-HLH cohort had the highest proportion of patients requiring ICU admissions and the highest levels of inflammatory markers such as D-dimer, ferritin, IL-6, IL-2 soluble receptor and TNF-alpha and the lowest levels of fibrinogen and albumin. Clustering analysis of laboratory values revealed substantial overlap in patterns between the COVID-CS and CAR-T CRS cohorts, but the MA-HLH cohort was a more distinct cluster. Patients with CAR-T CRS had significantly longer survival (p < 0.0001) than either COVID-CS (hazard ratio 3.7) or MA-HLH (hazard ratio 8.1); MA-HLH patients had the shortest overall survival (Figure 1). These differences were robust after adjusting for differences in baseline demographics. Univariate regression modelling revealed many of the laboratory values to be significantly associated with survival; multivariable analysis found ferritin, LDH and platelet count to be the most significant predictors. Administration of tocilizumab did not improve survival in COVID-CS or MA-HLH. Conclusions: In this retrospective, single-institution study of 3 different types of CSS, we observed that patients with hematological malignancies exhibit different symptom patterns at clinical presentation, have differing inflammatory biomarker profiles and experience variable clinical outcomes depending on the underlying etiology of the CSS. Patients with CAR-T CRS had significantly better survival outcomes compared to those with COVID-CS and with MA-HLH; the latter group had the worst outcomes among the 3 cohorts. This study provides insights into the hyperinflammatory profiles of different CSS in patients with hematological malignancies and highlights the need for developing effective treatments to improve patient outcomes.

Other Immunomodulatory Treatment for Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Cytokines in Cytokine Storm Syndrome

Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: Immunopathogenesis and Therapy

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children — Initial Therapy and Outcomes

IL-1 Family Blockade in Cytokine Storm Syndromes

JAK Inhibitors in Cytokine Storm Syndromes

IL-6 Blockade in Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Monocytic Phagocytes in the Immunopathogenesis of Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Cytokine storm in COVID-19: pathogenesis and overview of anti-inflammatory agents used in treatment

Criteria for Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Cytokine Storm Syndrome Associated with Hemorrhagic Fever and Other Viruses

Etoposide Therapy of Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Differing Inflammatory Profiles and Survival Outcomes of Cytokine Storm Arising from CAR T-Cell Therapy, COVID and Malignancy-Associated HLH in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

Cytokine storm and targeted therapy in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Laboratory Features and Pathology of Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Salvage Therapy and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Severe Cytokine Storm Syndrome of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Clinical Features of Cytokine Storm Syndrome

Anti-Interferon-γ Therapy for Cytokine Storm Syndromes

COVID-19 Pneumonia and Cytokine Storm Syndrome

Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: The Current Evidence and Treatment Strategies

The Cytokine Storms of COVID-19, H1N1 Influenza, CRS and MAS Compared. Can One Sized Treatment Fit All?