Simple severity scale for perforated peptic ulcer with generalized peritonitis: A derivation and internal validation study

Ryo Yamamoto,Shinya Hirakawa,Hisateru Tachimori,Tadashi Matsuoka,Hirotoshi Kikuchi,Hiroshi Hasegawa,Ken Shirabe,Yoshihiro Kakeji,Hirofumi Kawakubo,Yuko Kitagawa,Junichi Sasaki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002037
2024-08-08
Abstract:Background: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) causes peritonitis and requires surgery based on disease severity. This study aimed to develop and validate a severity scale for PPU with generalized peritonitis. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study used a nationwide multi-center surgical database (2013-2020). Patients aged >15 years who underwent surgery for PPU with generalized peritonitis were included and categorized into the derivation (2013-2018) and two validation (2019 and 2020) cohorts. Possible severity predictors were selected via a literature review, and Lasso models were developed to predict severe postoperative adverse events with 2000 bootstrapping. Final variables for the scoring system were determined based on inclusion frequency (≥90%) in the Lasso models. Discrimination and accuracy were evaluated using c-statistics and calibration plots. Cutoff values for minimal postoperative adverse events were examined using negative predictive values. Results: Among 12,513 patients included (1,202 underwent laparoscopic surgery), 533 (5.9%), 138 (7.6%), and 117 (6.9%) in the derivation and two validation cohorts experienced postoperative adverse events. Age, dyspnea at rest, preoperative sepsis, III/IV/V of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and albumin and creatinine were selected for the final model. A 0-11 scoring system was developed with c-statistics of 0.812-0.819. Cutoff value was determined as 5, which predicted <3% probability of postoperative adverse events regardless of type of surgery. Conclusions: A score of <5 predicts minimal risks for postoperative adverse events and therefore would be clinically useful to determine type of surgery. Further studies are needed to validate the score.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?