The Role of Brain and Spinal Cord Norepinephrine in Autoanalgesia

W. Chance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb14637.x

IF: 6.499

1986-06-01

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract:The existence of endogenous mechanisms of pain control has been suggested by ancedotal accounts of pain inhibition during periods of extreme arousal or anxiety.'V2 Thus in life and death situations it is advantageous and probably necessary for survival to prevent conscious recognition of even normally disabling pain for a period of time. However, the counterproductivity of long-term activation of such a system is also obvious, since the organism does need to seek repair after an injury. Therefore, important characteristics of such endogenous nociceptive control must be very rapid activation and reasonably short duration. Based on neurophysiological observation, the theoretical framework of such an endogenous analgesic system was outlined by Melzack and Wall in the gate control theory of pain.3 These scientists suggested a gating mechanism at the spinal cord that would reduce the conscious appreciation of pain when additional somatosensory input was applied. Perhaps more important for endogenous control of pain was the second postulate of the gate control theory, suggesting the existence of descending central nervous system (CNS) control of pain perception in accord with past experience and current CNS activity? Working under the second postulate of the gate control theory of pain, we in 19765 demonstrated that the extreme hyperemotionality of septal-lesioned rats (increased CNS activity) and the fear classically conditioned to the environmental stimuli associated with the analgesia test (past experience) induced significant analgesia as assessed by standard tail-flick tests! Subsequent experimentation indicated that the analgesia exhibited by these lesioned rats was indeed secondary to their hyperemotionality, since both the antinociception and emotionality were reduced by the minor tranquilizer, d i a~epam.~ We also demonstrated that the analgesia of fear-conditioned rats was specific to the environmental stimuli associated with the fear, since removal of these stimulus cues significantly reduced the analgesia.* Rather than referring specifically to each of these paradigms as hyperemotionality-induced analgesia, acute footshock-induced analgesia, or classically conditioned fear-induced analgesia, we chose instead to refer collectively to all of these paradigms of behaviorally induced antinociception as autoanalgesic phenomena? This term seemed applicable since the analgesia is self-generated under appropriate behavioral conditions and therefore must result from the neuronal activity of endogenously synthesized effectors. The first experiments investigating the neurochemical basis of analgesia following long periods (30-60 min) of intense footshock (3 mA) reported increased brain endorphin activity (as suggested by reduced binding of [3H]naloxone) that paralleled the analgesia.loJ1 Early experiments by us demon-