Can clinicians identify community-acquired pneumonia on ultralow-dose CT? A diagnostic accuracy study

Anne Heltborg,Christian Backer Mogensen,Helene Skjøt-Arkil,Matthias Giebner,Ayham Al-Masri,Usha Bc Khatry,Sangam Khatry,Ina Isabell Kathleen Heinemeier,Jonas Jannick Andreasen,Sanne Sarmila Sivalingam Hariesh,Tenna Termansen,Anna Natalie Kolnes,Morten Hjarnø Lorentzen,Christian Borbjerg Laursen,Stefan Posth,Michael Brun Andersen,Bo Mussmann,Camilla Stræde Spile,Ole Graumann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01242-w
2024-08-07
Abstract:Background: Without increasing radiation exposure, ultralow-dose computed tomography (CT) of the chest provides improved diagnostic accuracy of radiological pneumonia diagnosis compared to a chest radiograph. Yet, radiologist resources to rapidly report the chest CTs are limited. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of emergency clinicians' assessments of chest ultralow-dose CTs for community-acquired pneumonia using a radiologist's assessments as reference standard. Methods: This was a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study. Ten emergency department clinicians (five junior clinicians, five consultants) assessed chest ultralow-dose CTs from acutely hospitalised patients suspected of having community-acquired pneumonia. Before assessments, the clinicians attended a focused training course on assessing ultralow-dose CTs for pneumonia. The reference standard was the assessment by an experienced emergency department radiologist. Primary outcome was the presence or absence of pulmonary opacities consistent with community-acquired pneumonia. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated using generalised estimating equations. Results: All clinicians assessed 128 ultralow-dose CTs. The prevalence of findings consistent with community-acquired pneumonia was 56%. Seventy-eight percent of the clinicians' CT assessments matched the reference assessment. Diagnostic accuracy estimates were: sensitivity = 83% (95%CI: 77-88), specificity = 70% (95%CI: 59-81), positive predictive value = 80% (95%CI: 74-84), negative predictive value = 78% (95%CI: 73-82). Conclusion: This study found that clinicians could assess chest ultralow-dose CTs for community-acquired pneumonia with high diagnostic accuracy. A higher level of clinical experience was not associated with better diagnostic accuracy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?