Contemporary Pediatric Heart Transplant Waitlist Mortality

Alyssa Power,Kurt R Sweat,Alvin Roth,John C Dykes,Beth Kaufman,Michael Ma,Sharon Chen,Seth A Hollander,Elizabeth Profita,David N Rosenthal,Lynsey Barkoff,Chiu-Yu Chen,Ryan R Davies,Christopher S Almond
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.049
2024-08-13
Abstract:Background: In 2016, the United Network for Organ Sharing revised its pediatric heart transplant (HT) allocation policy. Objectives: This study sought to determine whether the 2016 revisions are associated with reduced waitlist mortality and capture patient-specific risks. Methods: Children listed for HT from 1999 to 2023 were identified using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data and grouped into 3 eras (era 1: 1999-2006; era 2: 2006-2016; era 3: 2016-2023) based on when the United Network for Organ Sharing implemented allocation changes. Fine-Gray competing risks modeling was used to identify factors associated with death or delisting for deterioration. Fixed-effects analysis was used to determine whether allocation changes were associated with mortality. Results: Waitlist mortality declined 8 percentage points (PP) across eras (21%, 17%, and 13%, respectively; P < 0.01). At listing, era 3 children were less sick than era 1 children, with 6 PP less ECMO use (P < 0.01), 11 PP less ventilator use (P < 0.01), and 1 PP less dialysis use (P < 0.01). Ventricular assist device (VAD) use was 13 PP higher, and VAD mortality decreased 9 PP (P < 0.01). Non-White mortality declined 10 PP (P < 0.01). ABO-incompatible listings increased 27 PP, and blood group O infant mortality decreased 13 PP (P < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, the 2016 revisions were not associated with lower waitlist mortality, whereas VAD use (in era 3), ABO-incompatible transplant, improved patient selection, and narrowing racial disparities were. Match-run analyses demonstrated poor correlation between individual waitlist mortality risk and the match-run order. Conclusions: The 2016 allocation revisions were not independently associated with the decline in pediatric HT waitlist mortality. The 3-tier classification system fails to adequately capture patient-specific risks. A more flexible allocation system that accurately reflects patient-specific risks and considers transplant benefit is urgently needed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?