Abstract:Cognitive control helps us to overcome task interference in challenging situations. Resolving conflicts because of interfering influences is believed to rely on midfrontal theta oscillations. However, different sources of interference necessitate different types of control. Attentional control is needed to suppress salient distractors. Motor control is needed to suppress goal-incompatible action impulses. While previous studies mostly studied the additive effects of attentional and motor conflicts, we independently manipulated the need for attentional control (via visual distractors) and motor control (via unexpected response deviations) in an EEG study with male and female humans. We sought to find out whether these different types of control rely on the same midfrontal oscillatory mechanisms. Motor conflicts, but not attentional conflicts, elicited increases in midfrontal theta power during conflict resolution. Independent of the type of conflict, theta power was predictive of motor slowing. Connectivity analysis via phase-based synchronization indicated a widespread increase interbrain connectivity for motor conflicts, but a midfrontal-to-posterior decrease in connectivity for attentional conflicts. For each condition, we found stronger midfrontal connectivity with the parietal region contralateral to, rather than ipsilateral to, the acting hand. Parietal lateralization in connectivity was strongest for motor conflicts. Previous studies suggested that midfrontal theta oscillations might represent a general control mechanism, which aids conflict resolution independent of the conflict domain. In contrast, our results show that oscillatory theta dynamics during reactive control mostly reflect motor-related adjustments. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans need to exercise self-control over both their attention (to avoid distraction) and their motor activity (to suppress inappropriate action impulses). Midfrontal theta oscillations have been assumed to indicate a general control mechanism, which help to exert top-down control during both motor and sensory interference. We are using a novel approach for the independent manipulation of attentional and motor control to show that increases in midfrontal theta power and brainwide connectivity are linked to the top-down adjustments of motor responses, not sensory interference. These findings clarify the function of midfrontal theta dynamics as a key aspect of neural top-down control and help to dissociate domain-general from motor-specific aspects of self-control.

The interplay of cognitive control and feature integration: insights from theta oscillatory dynamics during conflict processing

The interplay of cognitive control and feature integration: insights from theta oscillatory dynamics during conflict processing

Two Independent Frontal Midline Theta Oscillations during Conflict Detection and Adaptation in a Simon-Type Manual Reaching Task

Neuronal networks underlying the conjoint modulation of response selection by subliminal and consciously induced cognitive conflicts

Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control

Conflict awareness dissociates theta-band neural dynamics of the medial frontal and lateral frontal cortex during trial-by-trial cognitive control

Alpha and theta band activity share information relevant to proactive and reactive control during conflict‐modulated response inhibition

Mechanisms underlying flexible adaptation of cognitive control: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence in a flanker task

Target Amplification and Distractor Inhibition: Theta Oscillatory Dynamics of Selective Attention in a Flanker Task

Dynamic low frequency EEG phase synchronization patterns during proactive control of task switching

Lateral Prefrontal Theta Oscillations Causally Drive a Computational Mechanism Underlying Conflict Expectation and Adaptation

Sequential and domain-specific processing mechanisms for dual cognitive-emotional conflict

The role of brain oscillations in feature integration.

Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time‐on‐task effects

Oscillatory Dynamics Underlying Emotion-Cognition Integration: Differential Role of Theta and Alpha Oscillations

Neural mass model-based study of frontal-temporal theta oscillations in human subjects during the performance of a cognitive control task

When conflict cannot be avoided: executive control dominates early selective sensory modulations during cognitive conflict

Tracing conflict-induced cognitive-control adjustments over time using aperiodic EEG activity

Multiplexed Levels of Cognitive Control through Delta and Theta Neural Oscillations

The Neural Dynamics of Conflict Adaptation Within a Look-to-Do Transition

Inhibitory Control in the Absence of Awareness: Interactions Between Frontal and Motor Cortex Oscillations Mediate Implicitly Learned Responses