Social Isolation and Implementation of Advanced Care Planning Among Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure
Hiroki Kitakata,Takashi Kohno,Shun Kohsaka,Daisuke Fujisawa,Naomi Nakano,Otoya Sekine,Yasuyuki Shiraishi,Yoshikazu Kishino,Yoshinori Katsumata,Shinsuke Yuasa,Keiichi Fukuda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026645
2022-10-29
Abstract:Background The implementation of advance care planning (ACP) in heart failure management is insufficient. Social isolation (SI) could be a barrier to ACP initiation, albeit the relationship between SI and patients' preference for ACP or end‐of‐life care remains unknown. Methods and Results We conducted a questionnaire survey, including assessments of SI using the 6‐item Lubben Social Network Scale as well as patients' perspectives on ACP and end‐of‐life care. Of the 160 patients approached by our multidisciplinary heart failure team during admission, 120 patients (75.0%) completed the survey (median age, 73.0 years; men, 74.2%). A Cox proportional hazard model was constructed to elucidate the short‐term (180‐day) prognostic impact of SI. Overall, 28.3% of participants were at high risk for SI (6‐item Lubben Social Network Scale score <12). High‐risk patients had more negative attitudes toward ACP than those without (61.8% versus 80.2%; P =0.035). The actual performance of ACP conversation in patients with and without high risk were 20.6% and 30.2%, respectively. Regarding preference in end‐of‐life care, "Saying what one wants to tell loved ones" (73.5% versus 90.6%; P =0.016) and "Spending enough time with family" (58.8% versus 77.9%; P =0.035) were less important in high‐risk patients. High risk for SI was associated with higher 180‐day risk‐adjusted all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 7.89 [95% CI, 1.53–40.75]). Conclusions In hospitalized patients with heart failure, high risk for SI was frequently observed. High‐risk patients were associated with a negative attitude toward ACP, despite higher mortality. Further research is required to establish an ideal approach to provide ACP in socially vulnerable patients. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms ACP advance care planning ADs advance directives EOL end‐of‐life LSNS‐6 6‐item Lubben Social Network Scale SI social isolation Clinical Perspective What Is New? Our study demonstrated that ≈30% of the hospitalized patients with heart failure were at risk for social isolation (SI). Despite their higher risk of subsequent all‐cause death, the risk for SI was associated with negative attitudes toward advance care planning conversations. In the setting of end‐of‐life care, "Saying what one wants to tell loved ones" and "Spending enough time with family" were less important in the SI group compared with the non‐SI group; despite its negative attitudes toward advance care planning, the risk for SI was associated with a higher risk for subsequent all‐cause death within 180 days. What Are the Clinical Implications? Cardiologists should pay more attention to routine evaluation for SI because patients at risk for SI show a negative preference for advance care planning conversation despite their poor prognoses. Several solutions, such as social prescribing, should be considered to decrease the prevalence of SI and provide an appropriate advance care planning approach to align with patients' care goals. Despite significant advances in medical treatment, heart failure (HF) is an increasing health problem worldwide with high mortality, especially for advanced cases. 1 , 2 Current international HF clinical practice guidelines recommend that patients with HF be considered for advance care planning (ACP) discussions in the early stage of their disease, before it becomes difficult to make their own decisions. 3 , 4 , 5 While its potential positive effects (eg, enhancing the likelihood of goal‐concordant care) are controversial, 6 , 7 ACP enables individuals to define and discuss goals and preferences for future medical treatment, particularly end‐of‐life (EOL) care, with family and health care providers. 8 Given the progressive nature of HF, many physicians and patients consider HF hospitalization an ideal opportunity to initiate ACP discussions. 9 Despite its recommendations, the im -Abstract Truncated-