Clinical Study of Photobiomodulation Effect at Postoperative Clefted Alveolar Ridge Bone Grafting

Luísa Belluco Guerrini,Nicole Rosa de Freitas,Lucas José de Azevedo-Silva,Caroline Chapernate Vieira Dos Santos,Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado,Thais Marchini de Oliveira,Ana Lúcia Pompéia Fraga de Almeida
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010524
2024-08-07
Abstract:This study aimed to evaluate photobiomodulation (PBM) adjunct effect on pain, swelling, and face temperature in individuals with oral cleft submitted to alveolar ridge bone grafting (ABG). The sample consisted of 46 patients with either incomplete or complete unilateral cleft lip and palate aged from 9 to 18 years, both sexes, who underwent ABG with chin donor area. Subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups: (1) Control (C): ABG (n=17); (2) PBM: ABG with PBM (n=14); (3) Simulated photobiomodulation (SPBM): ABG with SPBM (n=15). Aluminum Gallium Arsenide (GaAlAs) infrared laser was used at 808±10 nm and power of 100 mW±20%. GaAlAs infrared laser was applied on 14 points in the subject's face at 4J per point, at 2 times: Immediate postoperative period and 24 hours postoperative. The authors evaluated pain, swelling, and face temperature at 24 hours postoperative; at 7-day postoperative, the authors evaluated pain, medication use, and swelling decreasing perception. No statistically significant difference occurred between groups C, PBM, and SPBM. At 24 hours postoperative, pain values showed statistically significant difference (P=0.04) between group C and SPBM. PBM at the tested parameters did not reduce pain and swelling and did not significantly change face temperature of individuals submitted to ARBG.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?