Rhizoengineering with biofilm producing rhizobacteria ameliorates oxidative stress and enhances bioactive compounds in tomato under nitrogen-deficient field conditions

Md Manjurul Haque,Md Rahat Bari Rupok,Md Abul Hossain Molla,Md Mizanur Rahman,Habibul Bari Shozib,Md Khaled Mosharaf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34276
IF: 3.776
2024-07-08
Heliyon
Abstract:Nitrogen (N) deficiency limits crop productivity. In this study, rhizoengineering with biofilm producing rhizobacteria (BPR) contributing to productivity, physiology, and bioactive contents in tomato was examined under N-deficient field conditions. Here, different BPR including Leclercia adecarboxylata ESK12, Enterobacter ludwigii ESK17, Glutamicibacter arilaitensis ESM4, E. cloacae ESM12, Bacillus subtilis ESM14, Pseudomonas putida ESM17 and Exiguobacterium acetylicum ESM24 were used for the rhizoengineering of tomato plants. Rhizoengineered plants showed significant increase in growth attributes (15.73%-150.13 %) compared to the control plants. However, production of hydrogen peroxide (21.49-59.38 %), electrolyte leakage (19.5-38.07 %) and malondialdehyde accumulation (36.27-46.31 %) were increased remarkably more in the control plants than the rhizoengineered plants, thus N deficiency induced the oxidative stress. Compared to the control, photosynthetic rate, leaf temperature, stomatal conductance, intrinsic and instantaneous water use efficiency, relative water content, proline and catalase activity were incredibly enhanced in the rhizoengineered plants, suggesting both non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant systems might protect tomato plants from oxidative stress under N-deficient field conditions. Yield (10.24-66.21 %), lycopene (4.8-7.94 times), flavonoids (52.32-110.46 %), phenolics (9.79-23.5 %), antioxidant activity (34.09-86.36 %) and certain minerals were significantly increased in the tomatoes from rhizoengineered plants. The principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that tomato plants treated with BPR induced distinct profiles compared to the control. Among all the applied BPR strains, ESM4 and ESM14 performed better in terms of biomass production, while ESK12 and ESK17 showed better results for reducing oxidative stress and increasing bioactive compounds in tomato, respectively. Thus, rhizoengineering with BPR can be utilized to mitigate the oxidative damage and increase the productivity and bioactive compounds in tomato under N-deficient field conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?