Neighborhood-level deprivation and survival in lung cancer

Kathleen Kennedy,Ignacio Jusue-Torres,Ian D Buller,Emily Rossi,Apurva Mallisetty,Kristen Rodgers,Beverly Lee,Martha Menchaca,Mary Pasquinelli,Ryan H Nguyen,Frank Weinberg,Israel Rubinstein,James G Herman,Malcolm Brock,Lawrence Feldman,Melinda C Aldrich,Alicia Hulbert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12720-w
IF: 4.638
2024-08-06
BMC Cancer
Abstract:Background: Despite recent advances in lung cancer therapeutics and improving overall survival, disparities persist among socially disadvantaged populations. This study aims to determine the effects of neighborhood deprivation indices (NDI) on lung cancer mortality. This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study assessing the relationship between NDI and overall survival adjusted for age, disease stage, and DNA methylation among biopsy-proven lung cancer patients. State-specific NDI for each year of sample collection were computed at the U.S. census tract level and dichotomized into low- and high-deprivation. Results: A total of 173 non small lung cancer patients were included, with n = 85 (49%) and n = 88 (51%) in the low and high-deprivation groups, respectively. NDI was significantly higher among Black patients when compared with White patients (p = 0.003). There was a significant correlation between DNA methylation and stage for HOXA7, SOX17, ZFP42, HOXA9, CDO1 and TAC1. Only HOXA7 DNA methylation was positively correlated with NDI. The high-deprivation group had a statistically significant shorter survival than the low-deprivation group (p = 0.02). After adjusting for age, race, stage, and DNA methylation status, belonging to the high-deprivation group was associated with higher mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.81 (95%CI: 1.03-3.19). Conclusions: Increased neighborhood-level deprivation may be associated with liquid biopsy DNA methylation, shorter survival, and increased mortality. Changes in health care policies that consider neighborhood-level indices of socioeconomic deprivation may enable a more equitable increase in lung cancer survival.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?