Playing And Becoming Psychoanalysis
Karen Maroda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00332828.2024.2346062
2024-05-24
The Psychoanalytic Quarterly
Abstract:1 Benjamin, J. (2016). From enactment to play: metacommunication, acknowledgment, and the third paradox. Rivista Di Psicoanalisi , 62:565-593. 2 Civitarese, G. (2008). The Intimate Room. Theory and Technique of the Analytic Field . London: Routledge. 3 Pizer, S. (1992). The negotiation of paradox in the analytic process. Psychoanal. Dialogues , 2:215-240. 4 Ringstrom, P.A. (2001). Cultivating the improvisational in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanal. Dialogues , 11:727-754. 5 Winnicott, D. W. (1968). Playing: its theoretical status in the clinical situation. Int. J. Psychoanal ., 49:591-599. 6 Cooper does not include the page number to his reference, which is page 591. 7 Boston Change Process Study Group (1998). Non-Interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: the 'Something more' than interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 79:903-921. 8 Maroda, K. (1998). Seduction, Surrender and Transformation: Emotional Engagement in the Analytic Process . Hinsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press; Maroda, K. (2010). Psychodynamic Techniques: Working with Emotion in the Therapeutic Relationship. Guilford: New York; Maroda, K. (2022). The Analyst's Vulnerability: Impact on Theory and Practice. Routledge: New York. 9 Mitchell, S. (1984). Object relations theories and the developmental tilt. Contemp. Psychoanal., 20:473-499.
psychology, psychoanalysis