Long Covid: a global health issue - a prospective, cohort study set in four continents
Ekaterina Pazukhina,Esteban Garcia-Gallo,Luis Felipe Reyes,Anders Benjamin Kildal,Waasila Jassat,Murray Dryden,Jan Cato Holter,Allegra Chatterjee,Kyle Gomez,Arne Søraas,Matteo Puntoni,Nicola Latronico,Fernando A Bozza,Michael Edelstein,Bronner P Gonçalves,Christiana Kartsonaki,Oksana Kruglova,Sérgio Gaião,Yock Ping Chow,Yash Doshi,Sara Isabel Duque Vallejo,Elsa D Ibáñez-Prada,Yuli V Fuentes,Claire Hastie,Margaret E O'Hara,Valeria Balan,Tigist Menkir,Laura Merson,Sadie Kelly,Barbara Wanjiru Citarella,Malcolm G Semple,Janet T Scott,Daniel Munblit,Louise Sigfrid,ISARIC Clinical Characterisation Group and ISARIC Global Covid-19 follow up working group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015245
2024-10-21
Abstract:Introduction: A proportion of people develop Long Covid after acute COVID-19, but with most studies concentrated in high-income countries (HICs), the global burden is largely unknown. Our study aims to characterise long-term COVID-19 sequelae in populations globally and compare the prevalence of reported symptoms in HICs and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: A prospective, observational study in 17 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe and South America, including adults with confirmed COVID-19 assessed at 2 to <6 and 6 to <12 months post-hospital discharge. A standardised case report form developed by International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infection Consortium's Global COVID-19 Follow-up working group evaluated the frequency of fever, persistent symptoms, breathlessness (MRC dyspnoea scale), fatigue and impact on daily activities. Results: Of 11 860 participants (median age: 52 (IQR: 41-62) years; 52.1% females), 56.5% were from HICs and 43.5% were from LMICs. The proportion identified with Long Covid was significantly higher in HICs vs LMICs at both assessment time points (69.0% vs 45.3%, p<0.001; 69.7% vs 42.4%, p<0.001). Participants in HICs were more likely to report not feeling fully recovered (54.3% vs 18.0%, p<0.001; 56.8% vs 40.1%, p<0.001), fatigue (42.9% vs 27.9%, p<0.001; 41.6% vs 27.9%, p<0.001), new/persistent fever (19.6% vs 2.1%, p<0.001; 20.3% vs 2.0%, p<0.001) and have a higher prevalence of anxiety/depression and impact on usual activities compared with participants in LMICs at 2 to <6 and 6 to <12 months post-COVID-19 hospital discharge, respectively. Conclusion: Our data show that Long Covid affects populations globally, manifesting similar symptomatology and impact on functioning in both HIC and LMICs. The prevalence was higher in HICs versus LMICs. Although we identified a lower prevalence, the impact of Long Covid may be greater in LMICs if there is a lack of support systems available in HICs. Further research into the aetiology of Long Covid and the burden in LMICs is critical to implement effective, accessible treatment and support strategies to improve COVID-19 outcomes for all.