Assessment of genetically modified maize DP23211 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐163)
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms,Ewen Mullins,Jean‐Louis Bresson,Tamas Dalmay,Ian Crawford Dewhurst,Michelle M. Epstein,Leslie George Firbank,Philippe Guerche,Jan Hejatko,Francisco Javier Moreno,Hanspeter Naegeli,Fabien Nogué,Nils Rostoks,Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano,Giovanni Savoini,Eve Veromann,Fabio Veronesi,Michele Ardizzone,Ana M. Camargo,Giacomo De Sanctis,Silvia Federici,Antonio Fernández,Andrea Gennaro,Jose Ángel Gómez Ruiz,Tilemachos Goumperis,Dafni Maria Kagkli,Paolo Lenzi,Aleksandra Lewandowska,Franco Maria Neri,Nikoletta Papadopoulou,Tommaso Raffaello,EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),Jose Juan Sánchez Serrano,Giacomo De Sanctis,Jose Ángel Gómez Ruiz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8483
2024-01-20
EFSA Journal
Abstract:Genetically modified maize DP23211 was developed to confer control of certain coleopteran pests and tolerance to glufosinate‐containing herbicide. These properties were achieved by introducing the pmi, mo‐pat, ipd072Aa and DvSSJ1 expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP23211 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment, except for those in levels of histidine, phenylalanine, magnesium, phosphorus and folic acid in grain, which do not raise safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the IPD072Aa, PAT and PMI proteins and the DvSSJ1 dsRNA and derived siRNAs newly expressed in maize DP23211, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of maize DP23211. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP23211 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. Therefore, no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize DP23211 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP23211. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP23211 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
food science & technology