Cardiac MR Feature Tracking Derived Strain Analysis can Predict Return to Training following Exertional Heatstroke

Jun Zhang,Song Luo,Li Qi,Shutian Xu,Dongna Yi,Yue Jiang,Xiang Kong,Tongyuan Liu,Weiqiang Dou,Jun Cai,Long Jiang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101076
2024-08-02
Abstract:Background: Exertional heatstroke (EHS) is increasingly common in young trained soldiers. However, the prognosis marker in EHS patients remains unclear. To evaluate cardiac MRI feature tracking (CMR-FT) derived left ventricle (LV) strain as a biomarker for return to training (RTT) in trained soldiers with EHS in a prospective CMR cohort. Methods: Trained soldiers (participants) with EHS underwent cardiac MR cine sequences between June 2020 and August 2023. Two-dimensional (2D) LV strain parameters were derived. At 3 months after index CMR, the participants with persistent cardiac symptoms including chest pain, dyspnea, palpitations, syncope, and recurrent heat-related illness were defined as non-RTT. Multivariable logistic regression analysis is used to develop a predictive RTT model. The performance of different models was compared using the area under curve (AUC). Results: A total of 80 participants (median age, 21 years; interquartile range (IQR), 20-23 years) and 27 health controls (median age, 21 years; IQR, 20-22 years) were prospectively included. Of the 77 participants, 32 (41.6%) had persistent cardiac symptoms and were not able to RTT at 3 months follow-up after experiencing EHS. The 2D global longitudinal strain (GLS) was significantly impaired in EHS participants compared to the healthy control group (-15.81 ± 1.67% vs -16.93 ± 1.22%, P =.001), which also showed significantly statistical differences between participants with RTT and non-RTT (-14.99 ± 3.54% vs -16.53 ± 1.43%, P <.001). 2D-GLS (≤ -15.00%) (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08, 2.17; P =.016) was an independent predictor for RTT even after adjusting known risk factors. 2D-GLS provided incremental prognostic value over the clinical model and conventional CMR parameters model (AUCs: 0.72 vs 0.88, P =.013; 0.79 vs 0.88, P =.023; respectively). Conclusions: Two-dimensional global longitudinal strain (≤ -15.00%) is an incremental prognostic CMR biomarker to predict return to training in exertional heatstroke soldiers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?