From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee: Terminology Issues in Screening and Early Detection of Lung Cancer-International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee Expert Group Recommendations

Rudolf M Huber,Milena Cavic,Haval Balata,Andrea Borondy Kitts,John K Field,Claudia Henschke,Ella A Kazerooni,Anna Kerpel-Fronius,Robert A Smith,Emanuela Taioli,Luigi Ventura,Stephen Lam,David Yankelevitz,Martin Tammemägi,members of the Diagnostics Working Group, ED & Screening Committee,Dawei Yang,Javier Zulueta,Lucia Viola,Anant Mohan,Ella Kazerooni,Ricardo Sales Dos Santos,Long Jiang,Anne Fraser,Coenraad Fn Koegelenberg,Rudolf Huber
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.07.022
2024-08-02
Abstract:Introduction: To facilitate global implementation of lung cancer (LC) screening and early detection in a quality assured and consistent manner, common terminology is needed. Researchers and clinicians within different specialties may use the same terms but with different meanings or different terms for the same intended meanings. Methods: The Diagnostics Working Group of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee has analyzed and discussed relevant terms used on a regular basis and suggests recommendations for consensus definitions of terminology applicable in this setting. We explored how to reach consensus to define relevant and unambiguous terminology for use by health care providers, researchers, patients, screening participants, and family. Results: Terms and definitions for epidemiologic and health-economical purposes included the following: standardized incidence and mortality rates, LC-specific survival, long-term survival and cure rates, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and undertreatment. Terms and definitions for defining screening findings included the following: positive, false-positive, negative, false-negative, and indeterminate findings and additional and incidental findings. Terms and definitions for describing parameters in screening programs included the following: opportunistic versus programmatic screening, screening rounds, interval or interim diagnoses, and invasive and minimally invasive procedures. Terms and definitions for shared decision-making included the following: LC screening-possible harms and risks and LC risk and modifiers prior and posterior to a measure. Conclusions: A common set of terminology with standard definitions is recommended for describing clinical LC screening programs, the discussion about effectiveness and outcomes, or the clinical setting. The use of the terms should be clearly defined and explained.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?