Should SARS-CoV-2 serological testing be used in the decision to deliver a COVID-19 vaccine booster? A pro-con assessment

Matteo Augello,Isabell Wagenhäuser,Manuel Krone,Nicolas Dauby,Pietro Ferrara,Michela Sabbatucci,Simona Ruta,Omid Rezahosseini,Petar Velikov,Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas,Jose Montes,Carlos Franco-Paredes,Anna L Goodman,Sertaç Küçükkaya,Jose Tuells,Zitta Barrella Harboe,Olivier Epaulard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126184
IF: 4.169
2024-11-14
Vaccine
Abstract:Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has saved millions of lives in the past few years. To maintain a high level of protection, particularly in at-risk populations, booster doses are recommended to counter the waning of circulating antibody levels over time and the continuous emergence of immune escape variants of concern (VOCs). As anti-spike serology is now widely available, it may be considered a useful tool to identify individuals needing an additional vaccine dose, i.e., to screen certain populations to identify those whose plasma antibody levels are too low to provide protection. However, no recommendations are currently available on this topic. We reviewed the relevant supporting and opposing arguments, including areas of uncertainty, and concluded that in most populations, spike serology should not be used to decide about the administration of a booster dose. The main counterarguments are as follows: correlates of protection are imperfectly characterised, essentially owing to the emergence of VOCs; spike serology has an intrinsic inability to comprehensively reflect the whole immune memory; and booster vaccines are now VOC-adapted, while the commonly available commercial serological assays explore antibodies against the original virus.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?