Abstract:Purpose of study: There is a growing recognition in the area of back pain research that evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is important for assessing the treatment effectiveness and for making clinical decisions. Numerous measures have been developed to assess HRQL. Among them, Short Form 12-item survey (SF-12) has become many back pain researchers' top choice, because this instrument is much shorter than many other HRQL measures and can significantly reduce the burden of respondents and the cost for data collection. Despite its widespread use, the validity and responsiveness of SF-12 in patients with back pain have not been well established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the validity and responsiveness of SF-12 in patients with back pain. Methods used: Starting from January 1998, patients who consulted the Duke University Spine Center were asked to complete a comprehensive computerized survey questionnaire. The questionnaire included SF-12, Oswestry Back Disability Index and questions concerning patients' demographic characteristics, psychosocioeconomic status, medical history, present spine symptoms and the severity of back pain. A total of 2,520 patients who indicated in their first surveys that they had back pain were included in the validity study. Of these patients, 506 completed another survey in 3 to 6 months of follow-up and were used for assessing the responsiveness of SF-12. Only construct validity was evaluated, because content validity has been established, and the current lack of the “gold standard” for HRQL measure makes it difficult to determine the criteria validity. Construct validity was evaluated by assessing the correlation between the two summary scales of SF-12 and six other measures theoretically related or unrelated to these scales. of findings: Physical component summary of SF-12 (PSC-12) was significantly correlated with age, back pain, measures of overall well being and Oswestry Back Disability Index. Mental component summary of SF-12 (MCS-12) was significantly correlated with stress, depression, back pain, measures of overall well being and Oswestry Back Disability Index. Both PCS and MCS performed as expected without exception, demonstrating the construct validity of SF-12. The responsiveness of SF-12 was supported by several pieces of evidence. First, the changes in PCS-12 and MCS-12 were significantly correlated with the changes in back pain intensity. Second, for patients whose back pain improved, there was a significant increase in the follow-up PCS-12 and MCS-12 as compared with the baseline. Third, in the group whose back pain became improved or became worse, small to large effect size was obtained for PCS-12 or MCS-12. Relationship between findings and existing knowledge: To our knowledge, the current study is the first to evaluate the validity and responsiveness of SF-12 in patients with back pain. Overall Significance of findings: The current study demonstrated that SF-12 was a valid and responsive instrument for measuring health status or HRQL in patients with back pain. Given its brevity and the current findings, SF-12 may be considered as a useful outcome tool in the future back pain research. Disclosures: No disclosures. Conflict of interest: No conflicts.

The validity of single-item measures of health-related quality of life across groups differing in acute respiratory symptom severity

Evaluation of a short form for measuring health-related quality of life among pediatric asthma patients

Development and initial validation of the chronic hepatitis B quality of life instrument (CHBQOL) among Chinese patients

The commonly used adult generic quality of life instruments for chronic diseases with merits and demerits

Validation and Comparison of the Sf-6d and Eq-5d in Chinese Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: Validity, time benefits, and patient preference

Development and Validation of the General Module of the System of Quality of Life Instruments for Chronic Diseases and Its Comparison with SF-36.

Validation of an ultra-short global quality of life scale in a large population-based health survey

Comparison of responsiveness of asthma-specific and general instruments for evaluation of quality of life in patients with asthma

Development and psychometric assessment of the function-neutral health-related quality of life measure

Comparison of two instruments on measuring quality of life for patients with chronic diseases

Short-form Development of the Specific Module of the QLICD-CRF(V2.0) for Assessing the Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Renal Failure

Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Construct Validity of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire in Patients with IPF.

Convergent Validity and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure Questionnaire (MRF-28) and the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire (VQ11)

The reliability and validity of Chinese version of SF36 v2 in aging patients with chronic heart failure

Validity and responsiveness of Short Form 12-item survey in patients with back pain

The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?

Health-Related Quality of Life for People With Acute and Chronic Illnesses During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Measuring health-related quality of life

Generic versus Disease-Specific Health Status Measures

Comparison of performance of specific (SLEQOL) and generic (SF36) health-related quality of life questionnaires and their associations with disease status of systemic lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal study