Re: Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta‐analysis

M. Wiegerinck,J. Vis,B. Mol
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7661
2010-06-01
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract:We read with great interest the meta-analysis by Sotiriadis et al.1 on cervical length measurement as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms of preterm labor. The authors concluded that measurement of cervical length in symptomatic women can detect a significant proportion of those who will deliver within 1 week. We have several concerns about the authors’ methods and their conclusion. First, the authors pooled sensitivities, specificities and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs). However, it has been shown that one should not pool likelihood ratios in systematic reviews. Although likelihood ratios vary between zero and infinity, meta-analysis is complicated by the fact that not every combination of LRs of a positive and a negative test are appropriate2. Second, the paper focuses on the ability of cervical length measurement to identify patients who will deliver within 7 days (or before 34 weeks) of presentation, but we doubt whether this is the clinically relevant question. In view of the high a priori chance of preterm delivery within the next week among symptomatic women (reported as 11%1), at present women are admitted regardless of a possible increased risk identification. Thus, rather than conclude that measurement of cervical length in symptomatic women can detect a significant proportion of those who will deliver within 1 week and help to rationalize their management, we think it is more relevant for the test to identify women with a decreased (acceptable) risk who can be sent home safely without unnecessary invasive treatment. However, when we focus on maximizing the high sensitivity of the test, the specificity drops to 40%1. Consequently, we doubt whether the present review justifies the use of cervical length measurement in women with threatened preterm labor.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?