Efficacy of Antibiotic Regimens for Pneumonia in Young Infants Aged 0-59 Days: A Systematic Review

Krysten North,Alejandro Frade Garcia,Mark Crouch,Spencer Kimsen,Amber Hoey,Carrie Wade,Yumin Kim,Roger Chou,Karen M Edmond,Anne C C Lee,Chris A Rees
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-066588G
2024-08-01
PEDIATRICS
Abstract:Context: Pneumonia is a leading cause of death in young infants. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of different antibiotic regimens to treat young infant pneumonia on critical clinical outcomes. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, World Health Organization (WHO) Global Index Medicus, Cochrane Central Registry of Trials. Study selection: We included randomized controlled trials of young infants aged 0 to 59 days with pneumonia (population) comparing the efficacy of antibiotic regimens (intervention) with alternate regimens or management (control) on clinical outcomes. Data extraction: We extracted data and assessed risk of bias in duplicate. We used Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess certainty of evidence. Limitations: Trials were heterogeneous, which precluded data pooling. Results: Of 2601 publications screened, 10 randomized controlled trials were included. Seven trials were hospital-based (n = 869) and 3 were nonhospital-based (n = 4329). No hospital-based trials evaluated WHO-recommended first-choice regimens. One trial found the WHO-recommended second-choice antibiotic, cefotaxime, to have similar rates of treatment success as non-WHO-recommended regimens of either amoxicillin-clavulanate (RR 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.82-1.10) or amoxicillin-clavulanate/cefotaxime (RR 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.12). Among 3 nonhospital-based trials comparing oral amoxicillin to alternate regimens to treat isolated tachypnea among infants aged 7-59 days, there were no differences in treatment failure between amoxicillin and alternate regimens. Certainty of evidence was low or very low for all primary outcomes. Conclusions: We found limited evidence to support the superiority of any single antibiotic regimen over alternate regimens to treat young infant pneumonia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?