Abstract:This is a very special issue of the Asian Journal of Andrology (AJA), which has recently become a part of the Nature Publishing Group's stable.Prostate cancer is unquestionably the most controversial of all the solid malignancies, and we were both proud to be asked to serve as guest editors for this one-off publication.Accordingly, we have commissioned reviews from some of the best researchers and most experienced clinicians and combined these with state-of-the-art research papers.Prostate cancer is best regarded as a continuum, from the earliest microfoci of malignancy to hormone-relapsed disease, and in this special issue we have tried to cover as many aspects as possible of this progressive disease.This editorial aims to set the scene and introduce a complex subject that is examined in far greater detail in the commissioned reviews and original papers that follow.Worldwide, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy to afflict men beyond middle age, and is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer deaths.Although the incidence continues to rise worldwide, mortality from prostate cancer in the USA recently reached a plateau and has started to decline, but at a rate four times faster than that in the UK [1].Some have attributed this drop to the efforts made in North America to detect prostate cancer early, although other factors, including more effective treatment, may also have contributed.Although the incidence of prostate cancer is lower in Asian countries than that in the West, the incidence in the East is rapidly rising.Take Shanghai in China as an example; it is very worrying that the average annual incidence of prostate cancer rose from 1.833/10 6 in 1984-1989 to 9.59/10 6 in 2005 [2,3].Age is the strongest risk factor for prostate cancer, but a family history of the disease affecting one or more firstdegree relatives increases risk by around 2.8 times.Obesity and a Western-style diet high in saturated fats are significant risk factors for the development of prostate cancer.The very latest information on the genetic basis of prostate cancer is reported in the review by Guy et al. [4] in this issue.A large number of studies have evaluated the effects of diet manipulation/supplementation or drug treatment to reduce the incidence of prostate cancer, but the evidence for their efficacy is still weak.The 5a-reductase inhibitor finasteride has been shown to reduce the incidence of prostate cancer by 24.8% compared with placebo over a 7-year period, although at the cost of a small incidence of sexual side effects and a possible increase in the Gleason pattern of the cancers diagnosed in the treated group [5].In general, the earlier prostate cancer is detected, the better the outlook for the patient in terms of cure or arresting cancer progression.An increasing majority of patients present simply with an isolated increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA); however, there is no firm evidence that universal screening will reduce mortality, although trials are ongoing.The measurement of PSA, a glycoprotein responsible for liquefying semen, is currently the most effective single screening test for the early detection of prostate cancer.Approximately 25% of men with PSA levels above the normal range (≥ 4 ng mL -1 ) have prostate cancer, and the risk increases to more than 60% in men with PSA levels above 10 ng mL -1 .However, a recent study in prostate cancer prevention, in which all men in the placebo group received a biopsy, reported that the incidence of prostate cancer in men with PSA less than 4 ng/mL and normal results on digital rectal examination (DRE) was not inconsiderable [5].A particularly difficult clinical situation occurs when the PSA continues to rise in spite of a previous negative biopsy.A new molecular marker, known as PCA3, may be especially useful in this respect.A urine sample taken immediately after a prostatic massage is analysed.A value of greater than 35 indicates an increased risk that the prostate harbours a malignancy.Furthermore, this new marker may be useful in stratifying men with clinically significant tumours from those with low-risk cancers, which can be managed conservatively [6].As described here by Borley and Feneley [7], transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is the most commonly used modality to image the prostate gland and also to direct the prostate biopsy needle.Antibiotic treatment, usually with a quinolone such as ciprofloxacin, is given before and after the procedure to reduce the risk of infection, which is currently estimated at around 2%. Usually 8-14 TRUS-guided biopsies are taken from different regions of the prostate with an 18gauge needle.This procedure is now routinely performed on an outpatient basis, preferably after infiltration with local anaesthesia.Histological analysis confirms the presence or absence of cancer and provides a so-called Gleason score for each core.The higher the Gleason score, the greater the risk of disease progression and metastasis.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used to stage prostate cancer locally and to diagnose or exclude lymph node metastases.Promising results have been reported with the use of ultra-small super-paramagnetic iron oxide particles as an aid to nodal metastasis evaluation by MRI.The addition of magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy (evaluation of

The Clinical Predictors of Malignancy in the Prostate Gland and Their Correlation With Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels

Relationship between prostate specific antigen new parameters and Gleason score and clinical stage

Assessment of age specific serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels for Indian population: A retrospective analysis at a tertiary healthcare facility

A hospital-based study of prostate biopsy results in Indian males

Editorial and Introduction to Asian Journal of Andrology Prostate Cancer Special Issue

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the clinical factors influencing locally advanced prostate cancer

Relationship between endogenous testosterone and prostate carcinoma

Histopathological correlations of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and tumor grade among prostate cancer patients in Kano, Nigeria

Clinical and Radiological Factors for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Patients With PI-RADS 3 Lesions

A low prostate specific antigen predicts a worse outcome in high but not in low/intermediate-grade prostate cancer

Correlation between prostate specific antigen and prostate volume with disease symptom severity assessed by international prostate symptom score

Correlation of multiparametric MRI with histopathological grade of peripheral zone prostate carcinoma

Favorable Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels Correlate with a Worse Prognosis in High-Grade Prostate Cancer: a Population-Based Analysis.

Prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen levels in men enrolled in a large screening trial

Clinicohistopathological Correlation and Prognostic Significance of Molecular Biomarkers in Urinary Bladder Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Analysis

Consistent predictive ability of prostate‐specific antigen density prediction model for clinically significant prostate cancer across age strata

Correlation Between Molecular Biomarkers and Risk Factors for the Clinical Progression of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Using Tissue Micro Array Immuno Staining

[Total PSA, PSA Density and Biopsy Gleason Score in Predicting the Pathologic Stage of Prostate Cancer].

The U Shape of Prostate-specific Antigen and Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality in High-grade Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma

Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Epidemiology

Is there a non-linear relationship between dietary protein intake and prostate-specific antigen: proof from the national health and nutrition examination survey (2003–2010)