Serial Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Rate of Ventricular Blood Clearance in Patients with Intraventricular Hemorrhage

Vedang Vyas,Sean I Savitz,Seth B Boren,Andrea Becerril-Gaitan,Khader Hasan,Robert Suchting,Constanza deDios,Spencer Solberg,Ching-Jen Chen,Robert J Brown,Clark W Sitton,James Grotta,Jaroslaw Aronowski,Nicole Gonzales,Muhammad E Haque
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02070-7
2024-07-31
Abstract:Background: We developed a noninvasive biomarker to quantify the rate of ventricular blood clearance in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and extension to the ventricles-intraventricular hemorrhage. Methods: We performed magnetic resonance imaging in 26 patients at 1, 14, 28, and 42 days of onset and measured their hematoma volume (HV), ventricular blood volume (VBV), and two diffusion metrics: fractional anisotropy (FA), and mean diffusivity (MD). The ipasilesional ventricular cerebral spinal fluid's FA and MD were associated with VBV and stroke severity scores (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]). A subcohort of 14 patients were treated with external ventricular drain (EVD). A generalized linear mixed model was applied for statistical analysis. Results: At day 1, the average HVs and NIHSS scores were 14.6 ± 16.7 cm3 and 16 ± 8, respectively. A daily rate of 2.1% and 1.3% blood clearance/resolution were recorded in HV and VBV, respectively. Ipsilesional ventricular FA (vFA) and ventricular MD (vMD) were simultaneously decreased (vFA = 1.3% per day, posterior probability [PP] > 99%) and increased (vMD = 1.5% per day, PP > 99%), respectively. Patients with EVD exhibited a faster decline in vFA (1.5% vs. 1.1% per day) and an increase in vMD (1.8% vs. 1.5% per day) as compared with patients without EVD. Temporal change in vMD was associated with VBV; a 1.00-cm3 increase in VBV resulted in a 5.2% decrease in vMD (PP < 99%). VBV was strongly associated with NIHSS score (PP = 97-99%). A larger cerebral spinal fluid drained volume was associated with a greater decrease (PP = 83.4%) in vFA, whereas a smaller volume exhibited a greater increase (PP = 94.8%) in vMD. Conclusions: In conclusion, vFA and vMD may serve as biomarkers for VBV status.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?